Cited by 232Child Abuse and TraumaDeception detection and forensic psychologyChild Abuse and Related Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in children's disclosure of abuse in Israel: A national study

Hershkowitz, Irit, Horowitz, Dvora, Lamb, Michael E.·2005·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective To identify characteristics of suspected child abuse victims that are associated with disclosure and nondisclosure during formal investigations. Methodology The database included all suspected cases of physical and sexual abuse investigated in the state of Israel between 1998 and 2002. All investigative interviews were conducted using a single standardized protocol, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Investigative Interview Protocol. Findings Overall, 65% of the 26,446 children made allegations when interviewed, but rates of disclosure were greater in the case of sexual (71%) than physical (61%) abuse. Children of all ages were less likely to disclose/allege abuse when a parent was the suspected perpetrator. Rates of disclosure/allegation increased as children grew older, with 50% of the 3- to 6-year-olds, 67% of the 7- to 10-year-olds, and 74% of the 11- to 14-year-olds disclosing abuse when questioned. Conclusions Although most interviews of suspected victims yielded allegations, such rates of disclosure varied systematically depending on the nature of the alleged offences, the relationship between alleged victims and suspected perpetrators, and the age of the suspected victims. The findings obtained in this large and unselected data set confirm patterns previously reported in smaller and quite selective samples, most of them obtained in the United States.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.04.008

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ghetti, 2001, Resisting distortion?, Psychologist, 14, 592
  2. Pipe, M. E., Stewart, H. L., Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., & Esplin, P. W. (2003, August). Non-disclosures and alleged abuse in forensic interviews. Paper presented to a conference on non-disclosure and delayed disclosure of child sexual abuse, Satra Bruk, Sweden.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–231 of 231

Metadata

Authors
Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Lamb, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Lamb, Michael E.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
1203-1214
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043031689
Cited by
232
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child Abuse and Related Trauma
Keywords
child abuse disclosure, non-disclosure, child abuse investigation, physical abuse, sexual abuse, investigative interviewing, victim age, child victims, Israel
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Criminology, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Israel, Male, Self Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review