Cited by 284Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Disentangling the mental health impact of childhood abuse and neglect

Open access
Cecil, Charlotte A.M., Viding, Essi, Fearon, Pasco, Glaser, Danya, McCrory, Eamon J.·2017·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

It is unclear whether maltreatment types exert common or specific effects on mental health. In the current study, we aimed to systematically characterize the unique, shared and cumulative effects of maltreatment types on psychiatric symptoms, using data drawn from a community sample of high-risk youth (n=204, M=18.85). Analyses controlled for a range of potentially confounding variables, including socio-demographic variables, neighbourhood deprivation and levels of community violence exposure. Outcome measures included multi-informant reports of internalizing difficulties, as well as data on externalizing problems and trauma-related symptoms. We found that (i) consistent with previous studies, maltreatment types were highly interrelated and frequently co-occurred; (ii) symptom severity linearly increased with the number of maltreatment types experienced (more so for self-report vs informant ratings); and (iii) while most forms of maltreatment were significantly associated with mental health outcomes when examined individually, few unique effects were observed when modelling maltreatment types simultaneously, pointing to an important role of shared variance in driving maltreatment effects on mental health. Emotional abuse emerged as the main independent predictor of psychiatric symptomatology - over and above other maltreatment types - and this effect was comparable for males and females (i.e. no significant interaction with sex). Findings contribute to a better understanding of heterogeneity in individual responses to maltreatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.11.024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This finding supports evidence from non-quasi experimental studies and suggests that maltreatment may affect broad factors underlying multiple disorders rather than disorder-specific risk factors.

    “This finding supports evidence from non-quasi experimental studies (62–66), and suggests that maltreatment may affect broad factors underlying multiple disorders (e.g., altered brain structure and function (67, 68), emotional dysregulation (69), or information-processing biases (70)) rather than disorder-specific risk factors (29).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 284

Authors
Cecil, C. A. M., Viding, E., Fearon, P., Glaser, D., & McCrory, E. J.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Cecil, Charlotte A.M.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
63
Pages
106-119
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2557643468
Cited by
284
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 6
FWCI
29.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/N001273/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
childhood abuse and neglect, maltreatment type, emotional abuse, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, trauma symptoms, shared variance, at-risk youth, community violence exposure, neighborhood disadvantage, sex differences, psychiatric symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Regression Analysis, Residence Characteristics, Urban Population, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review