Gender and role associations between domestic violence during childhood and dating violence: Victimization among male college students mediated through violence justification beliefs
Abstract
Background Although the victimization experiences of male college students in dating relationships are gaining increasing scholarly attention, there is still limited empirical evidence and theoretical understanding of the mechanism through which male victims of domestic violence experience subsequent dating violence. Objective This study aims to gain a deeper understanding of the specific mechanisms through which male victimization of domestic violence during childhood transmits to dating violence experience in adulthood. Whether the intergenerational transmission of violence may be explained by gendered pathways or by male participants' identification with the victim's position will be tested. Participants and setting Participants included 526 South Korean male college students in Seoul. Methods Child abuse, witnessing interparental violence, and beliefs justifying and accepting violence were divided based on the gender of the offender and victim to assess distinct effects. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to evaluate the relationships between dating violence victimization and child abuse/witnessing interparental violence and the mediation effect of beliefs justifying violence in the relationships between the variables. Results Both paternal and maternal abuse have significant direct relationships with male dating violence victimization. Witnessing mother-to-father violence had a significant and direct relationship with male victimization while witnessing father-to-mother violence did not. The mediation effect of justification of female-to-male violence was confirmed between witnessing mother-initiated violence and male victimization, whereas justification of male-to-female violence did not show a mediating effect between witnessing father-initiated violence and male victimization. Conclusion Both role and gender associations were confirmed. The results imply that there are different ways through which children learn about violence. More specific targets should be addressed in education programs to break the vicious cycle of violence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kwon and You (2023) found that men who witnessed and experienced maternal abuse were more likely to experience victimization in intimate relationships.
“Yet, through structural equation modeling (SEM), Kwon and You (2023) found that men who witnessed and experienced maternal abuse were more likely to experience victimization in intimate relationships.”
From Theoretical Analysis of the Cycle of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Kwon & You, 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Kwon, M., & You, S.
- Affiliations
- Hankuk University of Foreign Studies (KR)
- Corresponding author
- You, Sukkyung
- ORCID
- You, Sukkyung
- Venue
- Child Abuse & Neglect
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 141
- Pages
- 106233
- ISSN
- 0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4376629137
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Keywords
- child abuse, dating violence victimization, male university students, intergenerational transmission of violence, offender gender, victim gender, South Korea
- MeSH terms
- Intimate Partner Violence, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Mothers, Students, Domestic Violence, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review