Cited by 105Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

The prevalence of child sexual abuse with online sexual abuse added

Finkelhor, David, Turner, Heather, Colburn, Deirdre·2024·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Background and objective Research efforts are measuring various forms of online sexual abuse. There is a need to incorporate such measures of online sexual abuse into the calculation of overall prevalence rates for child sexual abuse.Participants A sample of 2639 respondents aged 18-to-28 was recruited from a nationally representative online panel.Methods Using an online questionnaire, respondents were assessed via self-report about 9 types of online sexual abuse in childhood and were also assessed with 2 questions that have been used to assess generic child sexual abuse prevalence in previous surveys.Results The addition of the online abuse to the generic questions about child sexual abuse raised the overall prevalence rate from 13.5 % to 21.7 %. The rate for females increased from 19.8 % to 31.6 % and for males from 6.2 % to 10.8 %. The largest independent contribution to the overall combined increase were the offenses involving non-consensual image sharing and voluntary online sexual interactions with an impermissibly older adult partner. The inclusion of the online sexual abuse exposures also increased the ability to identify the survivors with the highest levels of current psychological distress.Conclusion The study highlights the importance of counting and including online sexual abuse in efforts to estimate the overall prevalence of childhood sexual abuse. The paper proposes 2 or 3 questions that could be added to sexual abuse questionnaires to assess these online offenses efficiently.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106634

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 105

Authors
Finkelhor, D., Turner, H., & Colburn, D.
Affiliations
University of New Hampshire (US)
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
149
Pages
106634
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390871142
Cited by
105
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 11
FWCI
51.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Justice (2020-R2-CX-0015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, online sexual abuse, prevalence estimation, non-consensual image sharing, psychological distress, questionnaire development, gender differences in abuse
MeSH terms
Aged, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review