Risk-taking behavior and academic self-efficacy as variables accounting for problematic internet use in adolescent university students
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Loneliness and depression are related to social media addiction.
“Loneliness and depression are related to social media addiction (4, 7)”
Inefficient self-regulation, neglect of personal life, cognitive preoccupation, mood modifying experiences, lack of tolerance, concealment of addictive behaviors, and escapism are signs of social media addiction.
“Inefficient self-regulation, neglect of personal life, cognitive preoccupation, mood modifying experiences, lack of tolerance, concealment of addictive behaviors, and escapism are signs of social media addiction (3, 7, 8, 19).”
There is a significant negative correlation between problematic internet use and academic self-efficacy.
“There is a significant negative correlation between problematic internet use and academic self-efficacy (7).”
Students with high self-efficacy are more willing to participate in academic activities and can develop effective strategies when in difficulties.
“Students with high levels self-efficacy are more willing to participate in academic activities and can develop effective strategies when in difficulties (7).”
Excessive social media use can cause emotional and identity problems.
“In addition, excessive social media use can cause emotional and identity problems (7).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Odacı, H.
- Affiliations
- Karadeniz Technical University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Odacı, Hatice
- ORCID
- Odacı, Hatice
- Venue
- Children and Youth Services Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 183-187
- ISSN
- 0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088218328
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- problematic internet use, risk-taking, academic self-efficacy, university students, adolescents, gender differences, computer ownership, family life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
