The development and validation of the Spanish adaptation of the Protective Factors Survey
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PFS has been validated with a Hispanic/Latino/a sample of families.
“The measure has also been validated with a Hispanic/Latino/a sample of families (Conrad-Hiebner et al., 2015).”
From The protective effects of social support and family functioning on parenting stress among Hispanic/Latino/a American immigrant parents with traumatic life experiences: A mediation analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Conrad-Hiebner et al., 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maru, M., Paris, R., & Simhi, M. (2023) · Infant Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1002/imhj.22053 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Conrad-Hiebner, A., Schoemann, A. M., Counts, J. M., & Chang, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- East Carolina University (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Conrad-Hiebner, Aislinn
- Venue
- Children and Youth Services Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 45-53
- ISSN
- 0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969013235
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- FRIENDS National Resource Center (KAN69975)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Keywords
- Spanish adaptation, child abuse prevention, Latino families, family protective factors, acculturative stress, immigration stress, social support, parenting knowledge, reliability and validity, cross-cultural adaptation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
