Parental emotional warmth and psychological Suzhi as mediators between socioeconomic status and problem behaviours in Chinese children
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychological suzhi is inseparable from the development of children's behavior.
“Numerous studies have demonstrated that psychological suzhi is inseparable from the development of children’s behavior [8,9,10,11,12].”
From Forgiveness as a Mediator between Psychological Suzhi and Prosocial Behavior in Chinese Adolescents (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Wu, L., Zhang, D., Cheng, G., Hu, T., & Rost, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Southwest University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Dajun
- Venue
- Children and Youth Services Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 132-138
- ISSN
- 0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1849817522
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- parental warmth, socioeconomic status, child behavior problems, mediation, emotional support, Chinese children, elementary school students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
