Barriers and facilitators for access to mental health services by traumatized youth
Open accessAbstract
Polytrauma is a highly prevalent public health problem in the U.S. with even higher rates in urban areas. Children with polytrauma often end up in multiple child-serving systems (e.g., mental health, child welfare, education, juvenile justice) with needs that are both complex and severe. Providers within these child-serving systems have potential to serve as gatekeepers to trauma services by linking youth with trauma-informed treatments and supports that promote recovery. The purpose of our study was to assess the perspective of providers who participated in a nine-month, trauma-informed care (TIC) training intervention on 1) their capacity to make referrals to trauma-specific services following the training, and 2) factors external to the training intervention that supported or hindered their ability to link traumatized youth with services. A subset of sixteen participants from the TIC training completed individual interviews. These participants were predominantly female, African American, and based in the social services sector. The constant comparative method was used to derive three thematic domains related to participant perceptions regarding youth referrals: 1) Organizational and provider capacity to provide trauma treatment or to make referrals to trauma-specific services, 2) Barriers to youth accessing trauma services, and 3) Suggestions for improving coordination of care and referrals. Our study highlights the influence of contextual factors on whether a TIC training can improve the capacity of agencies and individual providers to support traumatized youth in accessing appropriate services. The development of a structure that formally connects youth-serving agencies and providers with specialists trained in addressing traumatized youth is recommended.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For care-experienced young people, negative and unempathetic responses from adults in services reinforced childhood experiences of abuse, neglect, rejection and abandonment from caregivers, which were connected to feelings of defectiveness and helplessness.
“For care-experienced young people, negative and unempathetic responses from adults in services were found to reinforce childhood experiences of abuse, neglect, rejection and abandonment from caregivers, which were connected to feelings of defectiveness and helplessness (Damian et al. 2018).”
From "You Have the Choice of Whether You're Going to Get Help or Attempt Suicide": Exploring the Process and Impact of Mental Health Help-Seeking with Young People (16–25 Years) (2025) · cites this paper as Damian et al. 2018
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInappropriate service provision can contribute to hopelessness, loneliness and suicidal pathways.
“these findings highlight how inappropriate service provision can contribute to hopelessness, loneliness and suicidal pathways”
From "You Have the Choice of Whether You're Going to Get Help or Attempt Suicide": Exploring the Process and Impact of Mental Health Help-Seeking with Young People (16–25 Years) (2025) · cites this paper as Damian et al. 2018
The Results (§3.2; page not supplied) describe poor coordination, staff shortages and delays in traumatized youths’ access to care. Neither those passages nor searches for hopelessness, loneliness and suicide address whether inappropriate service provision contributes to the three claimed outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Damian, A. J., Gallo, J. J., & Mendelson, T.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Damian, April Joy
- Venue
- Children and Youth Services Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 273-278
- ISSN
- 0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5962297
- OpenAlex
- W2783613231
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- National Institutes of Health (F31HD090851)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- polytrauma, traumatized youth, trauma-informed care, provider training, referral services, barriers to mental health care, inter-agency coordination, organizational capacity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review