Cited by 27Child Welfare and AdoptionSocial Work Education and PracticeLegal and Social Justice Studies

Measurement and correlates of foster care placement moves

Open access
Font, Sarah A., Sattler, Kierra M.P., Gershoff, Elizabeth T.·2018·Children and Youth Services Review

Abstract

Placement stability is a major priority in the foster care system. However, the measurement of placement stability and the reasons children move are complex issues that warrant considerable attention. In this study, we used a two-year Texas foster care entry cohort to examine the extent to which children experience "progress moves", such as moving to a sibling placement or to live with a relative, versus non-progress moves, such as moving due to risk of abuse. Our sample consisted of 23,760 children and 66,585 placements statewide. Using two methods of classifying moves as either progress or non-progress, we found, of placements that ended with a move to a new placement, 29-43% ended with progress moves, and 57-71% ended with non-progress moves. Classification of move types was consistent across methods overall, but far less when the pre-move placement was in a shelter or restrictive setting. Additional analyses showed that the prevalence and risk factors for adverse moves varied across placement setting. Implications for the measurement and improvement of placement stability are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.06.019

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few studies specifically modeled placement disruptions or non-progress moves rather than any placement change.

    “Lastly, few studies specifically modeled placement disruptions, or non-progress moves (versus any placement change; for exceptions, see: Font et al., 2018; Leathers, 2006; Sattler et al., 2018).”

    From Sibling Separation and Placement Instability for Children in Foster Care (2022) · cites this paper as Font et al., 2018

  • Some studies have data only on children in foster care and therefore cannot measure separation from siblings who remain at home.

    “Others only have data on children in foster care, and thus cannot measure separation from siblings who remain at home (Font et al., 2018; Sattler et al., 2018).”

    From Sibling Separation and Placement Instability for Children in Foster Care (2022) · cites this paper as Font et al., 2018

  • Compared with studies elsewhere, these data have few cases with ambiguous reason codes such as 'Other'.

    “In addition, unlike studies conducted elsewhere (Font et al., 2018), our data have few cases coded with ambiguous reasons (e.g., “Other”).”

    From Sibling Separation and Placement Instability for Children in Foster Care (2022) · cites this paper as Font et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 27

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Aarons GA James S Monn AR Raghavan R Wells RS Leslie LK Behavior problems and placement change in a national child welfare sample: A prospective study Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 2010 49 1 70– 80 20215928 PMC4131764
  2. Andersen SH Fallesen P Family matters? The effect of kinship care on foster care disruption rates Child Abuse & Neglect 2015 48 68– 79 26195029
  3. Barber JG Delfabbro PH Cooper L The predictors of unsuccessful transition to foster care Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2001 42 6 785– 790 11583251
  4. Beeman SK Kim H Bullerdick SK Factors affecting placement of children in kinship and nonkinship foster care Children and Youth Services Review 2000 22 1 37– 54
  5. Chamberlain P Price JM Reid JB Landsverk J Fisher PA Stoolmiller M Who disrupts from placement in foster and kinship care? Child Abuse & Neglect 2006 30 4 409– 424 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.004 16600372 · DOI
  6. Coleman KL Wu Q Kinship care and service utilization: A review of predisposing, enabling, and need factors Children and Youth Services Review 2016 61 201– 210 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.12.014 · DOI
  7. Dregan A Gulliford MC Foster care, residential care and public care placement patterns are associated with adult life trajectories: population-based cohort study Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2012 47 9 1517– 1526 22127423
  8. Ehrle J Geen R Kin and non-kin foster care—findings from a National Survey Children and Youth Services Review 2002 24 1-2 15– 35 10.1016/s0190-7409(01)00166-9 · DOI
  9. Fallesen P Identifying divergent foster care careers for Danish children Child Abuse & Neglect 2014 38 11 1860– 1871 25176507
  10. Fawley-King K Trask EV Zhang J Aarons GA The impact of changing neighborhoods, switching schools, and experiencing relationship disruption on children’s adjustment to a new placement in foster care Child Abuse & Neglect 2017 63 141– 150 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.11.016 27919001 · DOI
  11. Fechter-Leggett MO O’Brien K The effects of kinship care on adult mental health outcomes of alumni of foster care Children and Youth Services Review 2010 32 2 206– 213
  12. Havlicek J Patterns of movement in foster care: An optimal matching analysis Social Service Review 2010 84 3 403– 435 20873020 PMC3065183
  13. Hegar RL Rosenthal JA Foster children placed with or separated from siblings: Outcomes based on a national sample Children and Youth Services Review 2011 33 7 1245– 1253
  14. Hyde J Kammerer N Adolescents’ perspectives on placement moves and congregate settings: Complex and cumulative instabilities in out-of-home care Children and Youth Services Review 2009 31 2 265– 273
  15. James S Leslie LK Hurlburt MS Slymen DJ Landsverk J Davis I Zhang J Children in out-of-home care: Entry into intensive or restrictive mental health and residential care placements Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 2006 14 4 196– 208
  16. Koh E Permanency outcomes of children in kinship and non-kinship foster care: Testing the external validity of kinship effects Children and Youth Services Review 2010 32 3 389– 398
  17. Kuha J Mills C On group comparisons with logistic regression models Sociological Methods & Research 2018 in press 10.1177/0049124117747306 · DOI
  18. Lang K Bovenschen I Gabler S Zimmermann J Nowacki K Kliewer J Spangler G Foster children’s attachment security in the first year after placement: A longitudinal study of predictors Early Childhood Research Quarterly 2016 36 269– 280 10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.019 · DOI
  19. Lin C-H Children who run away from foster care: Who are the children and what are the risk factors? Children and Youth Services Review 2012 34 4 807– 813
  20. Mood C Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it European Sociological Review 2010 26 1 67– 82
  21. Nesmith A Predictors of running away from family foster care Child Welfare 2006 85 3 585 16999386
  22. Oosterman M Schuengel C Wim Slot N Bullens RA Doreleijers TA Disruptions in foster care: A review and meta-analysis Children and Youth Services Review 2007 29 1 53– 76
  23. Rubin DM Alessandrini EA Feudtner C Mandell DS Localio AR Hadley T Placement stability and mental health costs for children in foster care Pediatrics 2004 113 5 1336– 1341 15121950
  24. Rubin DM Downes KJ O’Reilly ALR Mekonnen R Luan X Localio R Impact of kinship care on behavioral well-being for children in out-of-home care Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 2008 162 6 550– 556 18524746 PMC2654276
  25. Rubin DM O’Reilly AL Luan X Localio AR The impact of placement stability on behavioral well-being for children in foster care Pediatrics 2007 119 2 336– 344 17272624 PMC2693406
  26. Ryan JP Hong JS Herz D Hernandez PM Kinship foster care and the risk of juvenile delinquency Children and Youth Services Review 2010 32 12 1823– 1830
  27. Sakai C Lin H Flores G Health outcomes and family services in kinship care: Analysis of a national sample of children in the child welfare system Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2011 165 2 159– 165 21300656
  28. Stacks AM Beeghly M Partridge T Dexter C Effects of placement type on the language developmental trajectories of maltreated children from infancy to early childhood Child Maltreatment 2011 16 4 287– 299 22146859
  29. Strijker J Knorth EJ Knot-Dickscheit J Placement history of foster children: a study of placement history and outcomes in long-term family foster care Child Welfare 2008 87 5 19402362
  30. Testa MF Slack KS The gift of kinship foster care Children and Youth Services Review 2002 24 1-2 79– 108 10.1016/s0190-7409(01)00169-4 · DOI
  31. Usher CL Randolph KA Gogan HC Placement patterns in foster care Social Service Review 1999 73 1 22– 29
  32. Webster D Barth RP Needell B Placement stability for children in out-of-home care: a longitudinal analysis Child Welfare 2000 79 5 11021350
  33. Wildeman C Emanuel N Cumulative Risks of Foster Care Placement by Age 18 for US Children, 2000-2011 PloS One 2014 9 3 e92785 24671254 PMC3966831
  34. Winokur M Holtan A Valentine D Kinship care for the safety, permanency and well-being of children removed from their home for maltreatment (a review) 2009 1 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 19160287
  35. Winokur M Holtan A Batchelder KE Winokur M Kinship Care for the Safety, Permanency, and Well-being of Children Permanency, and Well-Being of Children Removed from the Home for Maltreatment: A Systematic Review Campbell Systematic Reviews 2014 2 PMC7386884 24488572
  36. Zinn A Havlicek J Pathways to Residential Care: Latent Class and Confirmatory Analyses of Adolescents’ Adverse Placement Event Histories Social Service Review 2014 88 3 367– 406

Authors
Font, S. A., Sattler, K. M. P., & Gershoff, E. T.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Font, Sarah A.
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
91
Pages
248-258
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809176604
Cited by
27
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042849, P2CHD042849, P2CHD041025, T32HD007081)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
Keywords
foster care, placement stability, sibling placement, relative placement, abuse risk, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review