CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73Child Welfare and AdoptionMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsCrime Patterns and Interventions

Group climate and treatment motivation in secure residential and forensic youth care from the perspective of self determination theory

van der Helm, G.H.P., Kuiper, C.H.Z., Stams, G.J.J.M.·2018·Children and Youth Services Review
DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 73

Authors
van der Helm, G. H. P., Kuiper, C. H. Z., & Stams, G. J. J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
ORCID
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
93
Pages
339-344
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.028
OpenAlex
W2886508548
Cited by
73
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
SIA-Raak NWO (2015-02-18P)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
treatment motivation, group climate, self-determination theory, adolescents, institutional repression, autonomy, competence, relatedness, behavioral problems, recidivism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review