Cited by 13Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGut microbiota and healthBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Epigenetic phase variation in the gut microbiome enhances bacterial adaptation

Open access
Ni, Mi, Junker, Katerina, Liu, Yujie, Fan, Yu, Li, Yangmei, Qiao, Wanjin, Zhang, Xue-Song, Ksiezarek, Magdalena +7 more·2026·Cell Host & Microbe

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The human microbiome continuously adapts to variations in diet and host physiology. Epigenetic phase variation (ePV) mediated by bacterial DNA methylation can generate phenotypic heterogeneity within clonal populations. ePVs have been characterized in human pathogens, but their roles in commensals remain unclear. Here, we cataloged ePVs in infant and adult gut microbiomes, revealing genome-wide and site-specific ePV in response to antibiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation. Long-read metagenomics revealed genome-wide ePV mediated by structural variations of DNA methyltransferases. Analysis of public short-read metagenomic datasets further revealed a high prevalence of genome-wide ePVs in the human microbiome. Site-specific ePVs were identified and associated with antibiotics or probiotic engraftment. Focusing on an Akkermansia muciniphila isolate, we find a specific ePV regulating mucC, a gene of unknown function but whose heterologous expression enhances bacterial tolerance to antibiotics via a bet-hedging strategy. Thus, epigenetic modifications are used by gut bacteria to adapt to fluctuating environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chom.2026.04.019

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ni, M., Junker, K., Liu, Y., Fan, Y., Li, Y., Qiao, W., Zhang, X.-S., Ksiezarek, M., Mead, E. A., Tourancheau, A., Jiang, W., Blaser, M. J., Valdivia, R. H., Davey, L. E., & Fang, G.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Fang, Gang
Venue
Cell Host & Microbe
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-06
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1033-1049.e8
ISSN
1931-3128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406289903
Cited by
13
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 2
FWCI
22.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Host & Microbe (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
DNA methylation, gut microbiota, bacterial adaptation, DNA methyltransferases, structural variants, bet-hedging, Akkermansia muciniphila, antibiotic tolerance, fecal microbiota transplantation, probiotics, infant gut microbiota, clonal heterogeneity, gene expression regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review