The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rapid determination of chlorinated pesticides in fish by freezing-lipid filtration, solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
Abstract
An analytical method has been developed for measuring 24 chlorinated pesticides in fish tissue samples. Extraction of chlorinated pesticides was carried out by ultrasonication using an acetone-n-hexane (5:2, v/v) mixture. Most of the lipids in the extract were eliminated by freezing-lipid filtration, prior to solid-phase extraction (SPE) cleanup. During freezing-lipid filtration, about 90% of the lipids extracted from the fish samples were easily removed without any significant losses of chlorinated pesticides. For purification, SPE using Florisil was shown to be more effective than silica. Quantification was performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in the selected ion monitoring mode. Spiking experiments were carried out to determine the recovery, precision, and limits of detection (LODs) of the method. The overall recovery was above 80% in the spiked fish tissue sample at 100 ng/g level. The detection limits for chlorinated pesticides were ranged from 0.5 to 5 ppb, except for endosulfan I and II which was 20 ppb. The newly developed method is demonstrated to give efficient recoveries and LODs for detecting chlorinated pesticides spiked into fish tissue with high lipid content.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the determination of OCPs in fi sh tissue is a formidable challenge mainly because of the small quantities of target analytes and large amounts of interfering substances which adversely a ff ect the results of analysis [8].”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- von der Oost, 2003, Environ. Toxicol. Pharm., 13, 57, 10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00126-6 · DOI
- Smith, 2002, Food Chem. Toxicol., 40, 767, 10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00046-7 · DOI
- A.G. Smith, in: W.J. Hayes, E.R. Lawes (Eds.), Handbook of Pesticides Toxicology, Academic Press, San Diego, 1991.
- Daston, 1997, Reprod. Toxicol., 11, 465, 10.1016/S0890-6238(97)00014-2 · DOI
- Golden, 1998, Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 28, 109, 10.1080/10408449891344191 · DOI
- France, 1991, J. Agric. Food Chem., 39, 1871, 10.1021/jf00010a038 · DOI
- Vetter, 2001, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4157, 10.1021/es010060k · DOI
- Hopper, 1987, J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. Chromatogr. Commun., 10, 620, 10.1002/jhrc.1240101108 · DOI
- Long, 1990, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 73, 379
- Long, 1991, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 74, 493
- Lopez-Avila, 1993, J. AOAC Int., 76, 864, 10.1093/jaoac/76.4.864 · DOI
- Richter, 1996, Anal. Chem., 68, 1033, 10.1021/ac9508199 · DOI
- Schantz, 1997, Anal. Chem., 69, 4210, 10.1021/ac970299c · DOI
- Wenzel, 1998, Anal. Chem., 70, 4827, 10.1021/ac9806299 · DOI
- Lopez-Alvila, 1995, Anal. Chem., 67, 2096, 10.1021/ac00109a031 · DOI
- Sparr Eskilsson, 2000, J. Chromatogr. A, 902, 227, 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00921-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Janda, 1993, J. Chromatogr., 642, 283, 10.1016/0021-9673(93)80094-O · DOI
- King, 1998, Anal. Chem., 70, 1431, 10.1021/ac9708654 · DOI
- Castro, 2001, J. Chromatogr. A, 918, 371, 10.1016/S0021-9673(01)00751-8 · DOI
- Sanchez-Brunete, 2002, J. Chromatogr. A, 976, 319, 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00947-0 · DOI
- Manirakiza, 2001, J. Food Comp. Anal., 14, 93, 10.1006/jfca.2000.0972 · DOI
- Hong, 1993, J. Chromatogr., 639, 261, 10.1016/0021-9673(93)80262-7 · DOI
- Manirakiza, 2002, Environ. Pollut., 117, 447, 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00188-9 · DOI
- Muir, 1990, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 19, 530, 10.1007/BF01059072 · DOI
- Ling, 1994, J. Chromatogr. A, 669, 119, 10.1016/0021-9673(94)80343-9 · DOI
- Nam, 1989, Chemosphere, 20, 873, 10.1016/0045-6535(90)90195-Y · DOI
- Smith, 1984, Anal. Chem., 56, 1830, 10.1021/ac00275a018 · DOI
- Ryan, 1983, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 66, 700
- Fidalgo-Used, 2003, J. Chromatogr. A, 1017, 35, 10.1016/S0021-9673(03)01321-9 · DOI
- Cejas, 2003, Aquaculture, 216, 299, 10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00525-2 · DOI
- Almansa, 1999, Aquaculture, 170, 323, 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00415-3 · DOI
- Berdie, 1998, J. Chromatogr. A, 823, 373, 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00517-2 · DOI
- Tunistra, 1980, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 63, 952
- Meadows, 1993, Chemophere, 11, 1993, 10.1016/0045-6535(93)90026-2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, X.-C., Shu, B., Li, S., Yang, Z.-G., & Qiu, B. (2017) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2016.09.069 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, J., Kim, H.-Y., Kim, D.-G., Seo, J., & Kim, K.-J.
- Affiliations
- Korea Basic Science Institute (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Hong, Jongki
- Venue
- Journal of Chromatography A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 1038
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 27-35
- ISSN
- 0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086738957
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- organochlorine pesticides, fish tissue, solid-phase extraction, Florisil, ultrasound-assisted extraction, lipid removal, endosulfan, pesticide residues in fish, detection limit
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Filtration, Fishes, Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Pesticides, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spectrometry, Mass, Fast Atom Bombardment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review