Gas chromatography with atomic emission detection for dimethylselenide and dimethyldiselenide determination in waters and plant materials using a purge-and-trap preconcentration system
Abstract
Dimethylselenide (DMSe) and dimethyldiselenide (DMDSe) were determined in plant and water samples by capillary gas chromatography using microwave induced-plasma atomic emission spectrometry for detection. The analytes were leached from the solid samples into methanol by using an ultrasonic probe, and a portion of the extract was preconcentrated by means of a purge-and-trap system before being chromatographed. The analytes were directly purged from the water samples in the presence of 6% (v/v) methanol. Element-specific detection and quantification was carried out by monitoring the selenium (196 nm) emission line. Calibration curves were obtained by plotting peak area versus concentration and the correlation coefficients for linear calibration were 0.9999 for both analytes. Detection limits of 0.8 and 1.1 ng l(-1) were obtained for DMSe and DMDSe, respectively, for water samples. For plant materials, the detection limits calculated for 0.5 g samples were 0.3 and 0.4 ng g(-1) for DMSe and DMDSe, respectively. Concentration levels of DMSe ranging from 1.2 to 4.2 ng g(-1) were found in some of the plant materials analyzed. No DMDSe was found in any of the samples. The accuracy of the method was checked by analyzing different spiked water and plant samples.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concentrations of up to 9 nM DMSe and 11 nM DMDSe have been measured in river sediments, while in river water up to 37 pM DMSe has been quantified.
“Concentrations of up to 9 nM DMSe and 11 nM DMDSe have been measured in river sediments [254], while in river water up to 37 pM DMSe has been quantified [255].”
From Selenium Cycling Across Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Interfaces: A Critical Review (2015) · cites this paper as [255]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Selenium Cycling Across Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Interfaces: A Critical Review
Winkel, L., Vriens, B., Jones, G., Schneider, L., Pilon-Smits, E., & Bañuelos, G. (2015) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu7064199 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
“Concentrations of up to 9 nM DMSe and 11 nM DMDSe have been measured in river sediments [254], while in river water up to 37 pM DMSe has been quantified [255].”
- Authors
- Campillo, N., Aguinaga, N., Viñas, P., López-García, I., & Hernández-Córdoba, M.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Murcia (ES)
- Venue
- Journal of Chromatography A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 1095
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 138-144
- ISSN
- 0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033548694
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
- Keywords
- dimethylselenide, ultrasound-assisted extraction, plant material, water samples
- MeSH terms
- Chromatography, Gas, Poaceae, Plants, Spectrophotometry, Atomic, Vegetables, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Organoselenium Compounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review