The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simultaneous determination of benzophenone-type UV filters in water and soil by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
A novel method has been developed to simultaneously determine and quantify seven organic UV filters employing liquid (solid)-liquid extraction, derivatization with N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) and gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection in various environmental matrices. The UV filters determined were: benzophenone (BP), benzhydrol (BH), 4-hydroxybenzophenone (HBP), 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone (HMB), 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone (DHB), 2,2'-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone (DHMB) and 2,3,4-trihydroxylbenzophenone (THB). Under optimal conditions, the analysis required 23 min and good linearity over the range of 10-2,500 ng/L in water and 100-25,000 ng/kg in soil for each UV filter obtained. The high recovery (62-114% and 60-125% for water and soil samples, respectively) and the low RSD values (less than 13.9 and 17.2% for water and soil samples, respectively) indicated the high performance of this method. The method detection limits (MDLs) were relatively low, ranging from 5 to 100 ng/L or kg and quantification limits ranged between 25 and 500 ng/L or kg for all test compounds. This validated method was applied in the analysis of seven BP-type UV filters collecting water and soil samples in Korea, between April and May 2003. The overall concentration of UV filters in the soil sample (500-18,380 ng/kg) was highly distributed in water sample (27-204 ng/L). The established method was successfully applied to monitor the residue measurement of the BP-type UV filters in environmental water and soil samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of risk from potential emerging contaminants in UK groundwater
Stuart, M., Lapworth, D., Crane, E., & Hart, A. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.072 · Cited by 801
Downs, C. A., Kramarsky-Winter, E., Segal, R., Fauth, J., Knutson, S., Bronstein, O., Ciner, F. R., Jeger, R., Lichtenfeld, Y., Woodley, C. M., et al. (2016) · Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00244-015-0227-7 · Cited by 640
Advances in analytical methods and occurrence of organic UV-filters in the environment — A review
Ramos, S., Homem, V., Alves, A., & Santos, L. (2015) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.055 · Cited by 321
Environmental Mass Spectrometry: Emerging Contaminants and Current Issues
Richardson, S. D. (2008) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac800660d · Cited by 268
Tsui, M. M. P., Leung, H. W., Lam, P. K. S., & Murphy, M. B. (2014) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.014 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeon, H.-K., Chung, Y., & Ryu, J.-C.
- Venue
- Journal of Chromatography A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 1131
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 192-202
- ISSN
- 0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072714396
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simultaneous determination of benzophenone-type UV filters in water and soil by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.07.036
- The paper
- Jeon, H.-K., Chung, Y., & Ryu, J.-C. (2006). Simultaneous determination of benzophenone-type UV filters in water and soil by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.07.036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.