Cited by 107Pesticide Residue Analysis and SafetyAnalytical chemistry methods developmentAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

Multipesticide residue analysis in maize combining acetonitrile-based extraction with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Cunha, S.C., Fernandes, J.O.·2011·Journal of Chromatography A

Abstract

A fast and simple gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method for determination of forty-one pesticide residues in maize is introduced. The sample preparation involves liquid-liquid partitioning with acetonitrile in presence of anhydrous MgSO(4) and NaCl (QuEChERS) followed by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) using carbon tetrachloride as extractive solvent and the extract obtained by QuEChERS as dispersive solvent. The main factors influencing DLLME efficiency including extractive solvent type and volume as well as the volume of dispersive solvent were evaluated in this study. The DLLME procedure effectively provides an enrichment of the extract and a cleanup of certain polar matrix components, which can maximize the sensitivity when a single quadrupole MS is used. For validation purposes, recoveries studies were carried out at two concentration levels, yielding recovery rates in the range 70-120% for 82% of the analytes. A good linearity and precision, with relative standard deviations generally below 20% were obtained for all forty-one pesticides. The limits of detection obtained were lower than 19 μg kg(-1) for more than 63% of the analytes. In two of a total of ten samples of maize, residues of lindane, tefluthrin, pirimicarb, folpet and bifenthrin were found, although at levels below the maximum limit established for this kind of samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.08.066

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cunha, S. C., & Fernandes, J. O.
Affiliations
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Cunha, S.C.
Venue
Journal of Chromatography A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
1218
Issue
43
Pages
7748-7757
ISSN
0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050781438
Cited by
107
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
20.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Keywords
pesticide residues, maize, QuEChERS, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, acetonitrile extraction, carbon tetrachloride, sample cleanup, lindane, tefluthrin, pirimicarb, folpet, bifenthrin, food safety
MeSH terms
Acetonitriles, Edible Grain, Zea mays, Food Analysis, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Pesticide Residues, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Liquid Phase Microextraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review