Multipesticide residue analysis in maize combining acetonitrile-based extraction with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
Abstract
A fast and simple gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method for determination of forty-one pesticide residues in maize is introduced. The sample preparation involves liquid-liquid partitioning with acetonitrile in presence of anhydrous MgSO(4) and NaCl (QuEChERS) followed by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) using carbon tetrachloride as extractive solvent and the extract obtained by QuEChERS as dispersive solvent. The main factors influencing DLLME efficiency including extractive solvent type and volume as well as the volume of dispersive solvent were evaluated in this study. The DLLME procedure effectively provides an enrichment of the extract and a cleanup of certain polar matrix components, which can maximize the sensitivity when a single quadrupole MS is used. For validation purposes, recoveries studies were carried out at two concentration levels, yielding recovery rates in the range 70-120% for 82% of the analytes. A good linearity and precision, with relative standard deviations generally below 20% were obtained for all forty-one pesticides. The limits of detection obtained were lower than 19 μg kg(-1) for more than 63% of the analytes. In two of a total of ten samples of maize, residues of lindane, tefluthrin, pirimicarb, folpet and bifenthrin were found, although at levels below the maximum limit established for this kind of samples.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The major disadvantage of QuEChERS was its low enrichment factor.
“The major disadvantage of QuEChERS was its low enrichment factor [20].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rykowska, I., Ziemblińska, J., & Nowak, I. (2018) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2018.03.043 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Recent developments in dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
Saraji, M., & Boroujeni, M. K. (2014) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-013-7467-z · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Ten years of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and derived techniques
Campillo, N., Viñas, P., Šandrejová, J., & Andruch, V. (2017) · Applied Spectroscopy Reviews · doi:10.1080/05704928.2016.1224240 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Sajid, M., & Alhooshani, K. (2018) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.016 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Wang, X.-C., Shu, B., Li, S., Yang, Z.-G., & Qiu, B. (2017) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2016.09.069 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cunha, S. C., & Fernandes, J. O.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Cunha, S.C.
- Venue
- Journal of Chromatography A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 1218
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 7748-7757
- ISSN
- 0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050781438
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 20.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Keywords
- pesticide residues, maize, QuEChERS, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, acetonitrile extraction, carbon tetrachloride, sample cleanup, lindane, tefluthrin, pirimicarb, folpet, bifenthrin, food safety
- MeSH terms
- Acetonitriles, Edible Grain, Zea mays, Food Analysis, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Pesticide Residues, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Liquid Phase Microextraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review