Simultaneous determination of allantoin and glycolic acid in snail mucus and cosmetic creams with high performance liquid chromatography and ultraviolet detection
Abstract
A new methodology for simultaneous quantitative analysis of allantoin and glycolic acid in snail mucus and cosmetic creams was developed. HPLC separation was achieved a Synergi-Hydro RP column within 7min using isocratic elution with potassium phosphate (pH 2.7; 10mM) at a flow rate of 0.7mL/min at 30°C. Sample pretreatment was performed by dilution of mucus or cosmetic cream in the elution buffer, heating at 60°C for 20min, adjusting the pH to 2.9 and purification with hexane extraction. Linearity was determined with spiked samples and the LLOQ values of 0.0125 and 0.2500mg/mL were determined for allantoin and glycolic acid, respectively. Accuracy and intra- and inter-day repeatability were studied at three levels of concentrations (0.04, 0.08 and 0.16mg/mL for allantoin and 0.1, 1.5 and 4.0mg/mL for glycolic acid) using spiked mucus and cream base samples; mean values of recovery were in the range of 96.81-102.42% in all matrices tested, whereas the respective RSDs (%Relative Standard Deviation) were less than 3.04% in all cases. Spiked mucus and cream samples were stable (RSD<4.16 and relative error<4.34%) at room temperature and at 4°C for 1 week and at -18°C for 6 months; samples were also stable after three freeze-thaw cycles. The method was applied to the analysis of different lots of snail mucus, and of three commercial creams containing snail mucus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to the USA Food and Drug Administration, allantoin is a safe and effective active substance for skin protection at a concentration of 0.5% to 2.0%.
“According to the USA Food and Drug Administration, allantoin is a safe and effective active substance for skin protection at a concentration of 0.5% to 2.0% [35].”
From Chemical Variability and Biological Potential of Cornu aspersum Mucus as a Source for the Development of New Cosmetic and Pharmaceutical Products (2025) · cites this paper as [35]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hudz, N., Turkina, V., Alyokhina, T., Motyka, O., Chemerys, N., Rumynska, T., Lozynskyi, A., Jasicka-Misiak, I., & Kobylinska, L. (2025) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules30214197 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- El Mubarak, M. A. S., Lamari, F. N., & Kontoyannis, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Patras (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Lamari, Fotini N.
- Venue
- Journal of Chromatography A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 1322
- Pages
- 49-53
- ISSN
- 0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165010644
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
- Keywords
- allantoin, glycolic acid, snail mucus, cosmetic cream, simultaneous determination, HPLC method development, sample preparation, hexane extraction
- MeSH terms
- Allantoin, Animals, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Cosmetics, Glycolates, Mucus, Snails, Ultraviolet Rays, Reproducibility of Results, Skin Cream
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review