Cited by 29Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Multisegment injections improve peptide identification rates in capillary zone electrophoresis-based bottom-up proteomics

Open access
Boley, Danielle A., Zhang, Zhenbin, Dovichi, Norman J.·2017·Journal of Chromatography A

Abstract

While capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) provides dramatically improved numbers of peptide identifications compared with reversed-phase chromatography for bottom-up proteomics of mass limited samples, CZE inevitably produces lower numbers of peptide identifications than RPLC for larger samples. One reason for this poorer performance is the dead time between injection of samples and subsequent appearance of the fastest moving component. This dead time is typically 25% of the separation window in CZE, but is only 5% of the separation window in gradient elution RPLC. This dead time can be eliminated in CZE by use of a multisegment injection mode where a series of samples is analyzed by injecting each sample while the preceding sample is still being separated. In this paper, we demonstrate that capillary zone electrophoresis employing sequential injections can produce a doubling in peptide identification rate with no degradation in separation efficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.07.022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 29

Authors
Boley, D. A., Zhang, Z., & Dovichi, N. J.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
Journal of Chromatography A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
1523
Pages
123-126
ISSN
0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2729842187
Cited by
29
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Glynn Family Undergraduate Research Grant
  • National Institutes of Health (R01GM096767)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
capillary zone electrophoresis, sequential injection, shotgun proteomics, mass-limited samples, separation efficiency
MeSH terms
Peptides, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review