The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disruption tails and revival policies: A simulation analysis of supply chain design and production-ordering systems in the recovery and post-disruption periods
Abstract
Abstract We study production-ordering behaviour in a supply chain (SC) with disruption risks in recovery and post-disruption periods and the influence of severe disruptions on production and distribution network design. A real-life case-study of a disruption in a SC is considered and investigated with the help of discrete-event simulation blended with network optimisation in anyLogistix. Two novel findings are presented. First, disruption-driven changes in SC behaviour may result in backlog and delayed orders, the accumulation of which in the post-disruption period we call “disruption tails”. The transition of these residues into the post-disruption period causes post-disruption SC instability, resulting in further delivery delays and non-recovery of SC performance. Second, a smooth transition from the contingency policy through a special “revival policy” to normal operations mode partially mitigates the negative effects of disruption tails. The results show that isolated production and distribution network design optimisation can lead to severe decreases in performance in the event of SC disruptions. Contingent recovery policies need to be applied during the disruption period along with a revival policy in the post-disruption period to avoid disruption tails. These revival policies must be developed for the transition from the recovery to the disruption-free operations mode. A revival policy is meant to mitigate the negative impact of disruption tails and stabilise the ordering control policies and performance in the SC. Thus, recovery policies should not be limited to the disruption period only. They should also consider the post-disruption period and be included in SC design decisions. The revival policy should be included in the SC resilience framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ivanov, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922 · Cited by 2,280
Self-citationImpact of COVID-19 on logistics systems and disruptions in food supply chain
Singh, S., Kumar, R., Panchal, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1792000 · Cited by 904
Reconfigurable supply chain: the X-network
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1774679 · Cited by 501
Self-citationIntelligent digital twin (iDT) for supply chain stress-testing, resilience, and viability
Ivanov, D. (2023) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108938 · Cited by 270
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ivanov, D.
- Venue
- Computers & Industrial Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 558-570
- ISSN
- 0360-8352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2896004812
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disruption tails and revival policies: A simulation analysis of supply chain design and production-ordering systems in the recovery and post-disruption periods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.043
- The paper
- Ivanov, D. (2019). Disruption tails and revival policies: A simulation analysis of supply chain design and production-ordering systems in the recovery and post-disruption periods. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.