Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Disruption tails and revival policies: A simulation analysis of supply chain design and production-ordering systems in the recovery and post-disruption periods

Ivanov, Dmitry·2019·Computers & Industrial Engineering

Abstract

Abstract We study production-ordering behaviour in a supply chain (SC) with disruption risks in recovery and post-disruption periods and the influence of severe disruptions on production and distribution network design. A real-life case-study of a disruption in a SC is considered and investigated with the help of discrete-event simulation blended with network optimisation in anyLogistix. Two novel findings are presented. First, disruption-driven changes in SC behaviour may result in backlog and delayed orders, the accumulation of which in the post-disruption period we call “disruption tails”. The transition of these residues into the post-disruption period causes post-disruption SC instability, resulting in further delivery delays and non-recovery of SC performance. Second, a smooth transition from the contingency policy through a special “revival policy” to normal operations mode partially mitigates the negative effects of disruption tails. The results show that isolated production and distribution network design optimisation can lead to severe decreases in performance in the event of SC disruptions. Contingent recovery policies need to be applied during the disruption period along with a revival policy in the post-disruption period to avoid disruption tails. These revival policies must be developed for the transition from the recovery to the disruption-free operations mode. A revival policy is meant to mitigate the negative impact of disruption tails and stabilise the ordering control policies and performance in the SC. Thus, recovery policies should not be limited to the disruption period only. They should also consider the post-disruption period and be included in SC design decisions. The revival policy should be included in the SC resilience framework.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.043

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Ivanov, D.
Venue
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
127
Pages
558-570
ISSN
0360-8352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896004812
Cited by
216
References
0
FWCI
38.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disruption tails and revival policies: A simulation analysis of supply chain design and production-ordering systems in the recovery and post-disruption periods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.043
The paper
Ivanov, D. (2019). Disruption tails and revival policies: A simulation analysis of supply chain design and production-ordering systems in the recovery and post-disruption periods. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.10.043

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.