The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving supply chain resilience through industry 4.0: A systematic literature review under the impressions of the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most severe supply chain disruptions in history and has challenged practitioners and scholars to improve the resilience of supply chains. Recent technological progress, especially industry 4.0, indicates promising possibilities to mitigate supply chain risks such as the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive analysis of the link between industry 4.0 and supply chain resilience. To close this research gap, we present evidence from a systematic literature review, including 62 papers from high-quality journals. Based on a categorization of industry 4.0 enabler technologies and supply chain resilience antecedents, we introduce a holistic framework depicting the relationship between both areas while exploring the current state-of-the-art. To verify industry 4.0’s resilience opportunities in a severe supply chain disruption, we apply our framework to a use case, the COVID-19-affected automotive industry. Overall, our results reveal that big data analytics is particularly suitable for improving supply chain resilience, while other industry 4.0 enabler technologies, including additive manufacturing and cyber-physical systems, still lack proof of effectiveness. Moreover, we demonstrate that visibility and velocity are the resilience antecedents that benefit most from industry 4.0 implementation. We also establish that industry 4.0 holistically supports pre-disruption resilience measures, enabling more effective proactive risk management. Both research and practice can benefit from this study. While scholars may analyze resilience potentials of under-explored enabler technologies, practitioners can use our findings to guide industry 4.0 investment decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Building the Resilient Supply Chain
Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090410700275 · Cited by 3,664
Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience
Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09574090910954873 · Cited by 2,530
Ivanov, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922 · Cited by 2,280
1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives
Kshetri, N. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005 · Cited by 2,149 · cited 3×
“…and Prakash Singh (2021) x x x x x Illustration of BC mechanisms to achieve main SC objectives (including risk reduction) under consideration of IoT Kshetri (2018) x x x x Introduction of an enterprise capability evaluation model and sharing system using BC, IoT and AI to achieve risk reduction…”
InfluentialThe SAGE handbook of organizational research methods
Buchanan, D., & Bryman, A. E. (2009) · Cited by 2,123
Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727 · Cited by 2,100
(2009) · Cited by 2,062
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., & Sokolov, B. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086 · Cited by 2,055
Conducting research literature reviews: from the Internet to paper
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-6198 · Cited by 1,854
Cited by
Edge computing for Industry 5.0: fundamental, applications and research challenges
Sharma, M., Tomar, A., & Hazra, A. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3359297 · Cited by 312
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562 · Cited by 279
Hangl, J., Behrens, V. J., & Krause, S. (2022) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics6030063 · Cited by 63
Supply chain resilience: new challenges and opportunities
Shi, X., Liu, W., & Lim, M. K. (2024) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2023.2262396 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Spieske, A., & Birkel, H.
- Venue
- Computers & Industrial Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 158
- Pages
- 107452
- ISSN
- 0360-8352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3166468761
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 121
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving supply chain resilience through industry 4.0: A systematic literature review under the impressions of the COVID-19 pandemic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452
- The paper
- Spieske, A., & Birkel, H. (2021). Improving supply chain resilience through industry 4.0: A systematic literature review under the impressions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.