The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
About The Importance of Autonomy and Digital Twins for the Future of Manufacturing
Rosen, R., von Wichert, G., Lo, G., & Bettenhausen, K. D. (2015) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.141 · Cited by 1,474
Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect
Boschert, S., & Rosen, R. (2016) · Mechatronic Futures · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32156-1_5 · Cited by 1,158
Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin
Tuegel, E. J., Ingraffea, A. R., Eason, T. G., & Spottswood, S. M. (2011) · International Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1155/2011/154798 · Cited by 1,119
Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment
Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2013) · Manufacturing Letters · doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2013.09.005 · Cited by 1,090
Continuous maintenance and the future – Foundations and technological challenges
Roy, R., Stark, R., Tracht, K., Takata, S., & Mori, M. (2016) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.006 · Cited by 309
Cited by
Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art
Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2873186 · Cited by 4,391
Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification
Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474 · Cited by 3,612
“Categorical literature review Reference Type Level of integration Focused area Technology Boschert, Rosen (2016) review DT product lifecycle simulation Bottani et al. (2017) case-study DT PPC simulation Brenner, Hummel (2017) definition DT PPC sensors Cai et al. (2017) concept DM maintenance simulation Frazzon et al.…”
BackgroundCharacterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review
Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., & Hicks, B. (2020) · CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002 · Cited by 2,422
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin
Qi, Q., Tao, F., Hu, T., Anwer, N., Liu, A., Wei, Y., Wang, L., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001 · Cited by 1,579
Metadata
- Authors
- Söderberg, R., Wärmefjord, K., Carlson, J. S., & Lindkvist, L.
- Venue
- CIRP Annals
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 137-140
- ISSN
- 0007-8506 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2606656271
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 51.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.038
- The paper
- Söderberg, R., Wärmefjord, K., Carlson, J. S., & Lindkvist, L. (2017). Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production. CIRP Annals. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
