Cited by 394Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies

Application studies of activated carbon derived from rice husks produced by chemical-thermal process—A review

Chen, Yue, Zhu, Yanchao, Wang, Zichen, Li, Ying, Wang, Lili, Ding, Lili, Gao, Xiaoyan, Ma, Yuejia +1 more·2011·Advances in Colloid and Interface Science

Abstract

The production of functional activated carbon materials starting from cheap natural precursors using environmentally friendly processes is a highly attractive subject in material chemistry today. Recently, much attention has been focused on the use of plant biomass to produce functional carbonaceous materials, encompassing economic, environmental and social issues. Besides the classical route to produce activated carbons from fossil materials, rice husk shows clear advantages in that it can generate a variety of cheap and sustainable carbonaceous materials with attractive nanostructure and functional patterns for a wide range of applications. From a comprehensive literature review, it was found that porous carbon that derived from rice husks, in addition to having wide availability, has fast kinetics and appreciable adsorption capacities too. Porous carbon materials also play a significant role in new applications such as catalytic supports, battery electrodes, capacitors, and gas storage. In this review, an extensive list of rice husks literature has been compiled. Conclusions have been drawn from the literature reviewed, and suggestions for future research are proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cis.2011.01.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 110 · Cited by 394

Authors
Chen, Y., Zhu, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Wang, L., Ding, L., Gao, X., Ma, Y., & Guo, Y.
Affiliations
Jilin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Yupeng
Venue
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
163
Issue
1
Pages
39-52
ISSN
0001-8686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003114129
Cited by
394
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Colloid and Interface Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eleventh Five-Year Research Program of China (20075009, 20100326)
  • Scientific and Technological Planning Project of Jilin Province
  • Jilin University (201003030)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Keywords
activated carbon, rice husk, biomass-derived carbon, porous carbon, adsorption, catalyst supports, battery electrodes, supercapacitors, gas storage, plant biomass valorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review