Application studies of activated carbon derived from rice husks produced by chemical-thermal process—A review
Abstract
The production of functional activated carbon materials starting from cheap natural precursors using environmentally friendly processes is a highly attractive subject in material chemistry today. Recently, much attention has been focused on the use of plant biomass to produce functional carbonaceous materials, encompassing economic, environmental and social issues. Besides the classical route to produce activated carbons from fossil materials, rice husk shows clear advantages in that it can generate a variety of cheap and sustainable carbonaceous materials with attractive nanostructure and functional patterns for a wide range of applications. From a comprehensive literature review, it was found that porous carbon that derived from rice husks, in addition to having wide availability, has fast kinetics and appreciable adsorption capacities too. Porous carbon materials also play a significant role in new applications such as catalytic supports, battery electrodes, capacitors, and gas storage. In this review, an extensive list of rice husks literature has been compiled. Conclusions have been drawn from the literature reviewed, and suggestions for future research are proposed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PAC derived from RS and RSS can provide a high surface area and a specific affinity for the adsorption of dyes from aqueous systems.
“Therefore, PAC derived from RS and RSS can provide a high surface area and a specific affinity for the adsorption of dyes from aqueous systems1,16,40–43.”
From The removal of anionic and cationic dyes from an aqueous solution using biomass-based activated carbon (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Most related studies used only either one of the pretreatment methods mentioned.
“However, most of the related studies used only either one of the pretreatment methods mentioned1,2,16,20,35,37,39–43,45.”
From The removal of anionic and cationic dyes from an aqueous solution using biomass-based activated carbon (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 110 · Cited by 394
- Authors
- Chen, Y., Zhu, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Wang, L., Ding, L., Gao, X., Ma, Y., & Guo, Y.
- Affiliations
- Jilin University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Guo, Yupeng
- Venue
- Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-52
- ISSN
- 0001-8686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003114129
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in Colloid and Interface Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eleventh Five-Year Research Program of China (20075009, 20100326)
- Scientific and Technological Planning Project of Jilin Province
- Jilin University (201003030)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Keywords
- activated carbon, rice husk, biomass-derived carbon, porous carbon, adsorption, catalyst supports, battery electrodes, supercapacitors, gas storage, plant biomass valorization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review