The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review of the early development of the thermodynamics of the complex coacervation phase separation
Open accessAbstract
Coacervation was defined as the phenomenon in which a colloidal dispersion separated into colloid-rich (the coacervate), and colloid-poor phases, both with the same solvent. Complex coacervation covered the situation in which a mixture of two polymeric polyions with opposite charge separated into liquid dilute and concentrated phases, in the same solvent, with both phases, at equilibrium, containing both polyions. Voorn and Overbeek provided the first theoretical analysis of complex coacervation by applying Flory-Huggins polymer statistics to model the random mixing of the polyions and their counter ions in solution, assuming completely random mixing of the polyions in each phase, with the electrostatic free energy, ΔGelect, providing the driving force. However, experimentally complete randomness does not apply: polyion size, heterogeneity, chain stiffness and charge density (σ) all affect the equilibrium phase separation and phase concentrations. Moreover, in pauci-disperse systems multiple phases are often observed. As an alternative, Veis and Aranyi proposed the formation of charge paired Symmetrical Aggregates (SA) as an initial step, followed by phase separation driven by the interaction parameter, χ23, combining both entropy and enthalpy factors other than the ΔGelect electrostatic term. This two stage path to equilibrium phase separation allows for understanding and quantifying and modeling the diverse aggregates produced by interactions between polyampholyte molecules of different charge density, σ, and intrinsic polyion structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phase separation and neurodegenerative diseases: a disturbance in the force
Zbinden, A., Pérez-Berlanga, M., De Rossi, P., & Polymenidou, M. (2020) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.014 · Cited by 500
Protein–polyelectrolyte interactions
Kayitmazer, A. B., Seeman, D., Minsky, B. B., Dubin, P. L., & Xu, Y. (2013) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/c2sm27002a · Cited by 406
Phase Behavior and Salt Partitioning in Polyelectrolyte Complex Coacervates
Li, L., Srivastava, S., Andreev, M., Marciel, A. B., de Pablo, J. J., & Tirrell, M. V. (2018) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00238 · Cited by 357
Martin, E. W., & Holehouse, A. S. (2020) · Emerging Topics in Life Sciences · doi:10.1042/etls20190164 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Veis, A.
- Venue
- Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 2-11
- ISSN
- 0001-8686 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022138623
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of the early development of the thermodynamics of the complex coacervation phase separation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cis.2011.01.007
- The paper
- Veis, A. (2011). A review of the early development of the thermodynamics of the complex coacervation phase separation. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2011.01.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.