Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Shear rheology of hard-sphere, dispersed, and aggregated suspensions, and filler-matrix composites

Open access
Genovese, Diego B.·2012·Advances in Colloid and Interface Science

Abstract

This paper reviews the shear rheology of suspensions of microscopic particles. The nature of interparticle forces determines the microstructure, and hence the deformation and flow behavior of suspensions. Consequently, suspensions were classified according to the resulting microstructure: hard-spheres, stabilized, or aggregated particles. This study begins with the most simple case: flowing suspensions of inert, rigid, monomodal spherical particles (called hard-spheres), at low shear rates. Even for inert particles, we reviewed the effect of several factors that produce deviations from this ideal case, namely: shear rate, particle shape, particle size distribution, and particle deformability. Then we moved to suspensions of colloidal particles, where interparticle forces play a significant role. First we studied the case of dispersed or stabilized suspensions (colloidal dispersions), where long range repulsive forces keep particles separated, leading to a crystalline order. Second we studied the more common case of aggregated or flocculated suspensions, where net attractive forces lead to the formation of fractal clusters. Above the gelation concentration (which depends on the magnitude of the attractive forces), clusters are interconnected into a network, forming a gel. We differentiate between weak and strong aggregation, which may lead to weak or strong gels, respectively. Finally, we reviewed the case of filler/matrix composite suspensions or gels, where rigid or viscoelastic particles (fillers) are dispersed in a continuous viscoelastic material (matrix), usually a gel. For each type of suspension, predictive curves of fundamental rheological properties (viscosity, yield stress, elastic and complex moduli) vs. particle volume fraction and shear rate were obtained from theoretical or empirical models and sound experimental data, covering ranges of practical interest.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cis.2011.12.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 383

Metadata

Authors
Genovese, D. B.
Venue
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
171-172
Pages
1-16
ISSN
0001-8686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164601395
Cited by
383
References
1
FWCI
15.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shear rheology of hard-sphere, dispersed, and aggregated suspensions, and filler-matrix composites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cis.2011.12.005
The paper
Genovese, D. B. (2012). Shear rheology of hard-sphere, dispersed, and aggregated suspensions, and filler-matrix composites. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2011.12.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.