Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Urban soundscapes: Experiences and knowledge

Raimbault, Manon, Dubois, Danièle·2005·Cities

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cities.2005.05.003

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Attenborough, 1976, Background noise levels in the United Kingdom, J. Sound Vib., 48, 359, 10.1016/0022-460X(76)90062-6 · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(76)90062-6
  2. Augoyard, J F (1999) The Cricket Effect. Which tools for the research on sonic urban ambiences? In: From awareness to action. Conference on acoustic ecology. Karlsson, Stockholm, pp. 1–7.
  3. Barrigon Morillas, 2002, An environmental noise study in the city of Caceres, Spain, Appl. Acoust., 63, 1061, 10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00030-0 · doi:10.1016/s0003-682x(02)00030-0
  4. Berglund, B and Lindvall, T (ed.) (1995) Community noise. Document prepared for the World Health Organisation. Arch Centre for Sensory Research 2, 1–195.
  5. Björk, 1994, Community noise in different seasons in Kuopio, Finland, Appl. Acoust., 42, 137, 10.1016/0003-682X(94)90003-5 · doi:10.1016/0003-682x(94)90003-5
  6. Bogo, 2001, Traffic pollution in a downtown site of Buenos Aires City, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 1717, 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00555-0 · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00555-0
  7. Boy, 2003, Les parlementaires et l’environnement, PROSES, 7, 1
  8. Brown, 1987, Urban noise surveys, Appl. Acoust., 20, 23, 10.1016/0003-682X(87)90081-8 · doi:10.1016/0003-682x(87)90081-8
  9. Calixto, 2003, The statistical modelling of road traffic noise in an urban setting, Cities, 20, 23, 10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00093-8 · doi:10.1016/s0264-2751(02)00093-8
  10. Canneli, 1974, Traffic noise pollution in Rome, Appl. Acoust., 7, 103, 10.1016/0003-682X(74)90026-7 · doi:10.1016/0003-682x(74)90026-7
  11. Dubois, 2000, Categories as acts of meaning: the case of categories in olfaction and audition, Cognitive Science Quaterly, 1, 35
  12. Dubois, 2005, Les catégories cognitives du bruit urbain: des discours aux indicateurs physiques, Acoustique & Technique, 49
  13. Durmisevic, 2001, A systematic quality assessment of underground spaces—public transport stations, Cities, 18, 13, 10.1016/S0264-2751(00)00050-0 · doi:10.1016/s0264-2751(00)00050-0
  14. Elshorbagy, 1984, Environmental acoustic quality in Jeddah urban sites, Appl. Acoust., 17, 261, 10.1016/0003-682X(84)90010-0 · doi:10.1016/0003-682x(84)90010-0
  15. Fidell, 1978, Nationwide urban noise survey, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 64, 198, 10.1121/1.381985 · doi:10.1121/1.381985
  16. Fisher, 1973, Current levels of noise in an urban environment, Appl. Ergonomics, 4, 211, 10.1016/0003-6870(73)90217-2 · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(73)90217-2
  17. Flindell, 1999, Non-acoustical factor in environmental noise, Noise and Health, 3, 11
  18. Garcia, 1991, Statistical analysis of noise levels in urban areas, Appl. Acoust., 34, 227, 10.1016/0003-682X(91)90007-2 · doi:10.1016/0003-682x(91)90007-2
  19. Guastavino, C (2003) Etude sémantique et acoustique de la perception des basses fréquences dans l’environnement sonore urbain (Ph.D. Thesis). Univ. Paris 6.
  20. Job, 2001, The impact of soundscape, enviroscape and psychscape on the reaction to noise: Implication for evaluation and regulation of noise effects, Noise Control Eng. J., 49, 120, 10.3397/1.2839647 · doi:10.3397/1.2839647
  21. Maffiolo, V (1999) De la caractérisation sémantique et acoustique de la qualité sonore de l’environnement sonore urbain (Ph.D. Thesis). Univ. du Maine, 285.
  22. Mochizuki, 1967, City noise in Tokyo, J. Acoust. Soc. Japan, 23, 146
  23. Mzali, M (2002) Perception de l’ambiance sonore et évaluation du confort acoustique dans les trains. (Ph.D. Thesis). Univ. Paris VI, 255.
  24. Raimbault, M (2002) Simulation des ambiances sonores urbaines: intégration des aspects qualitatifs (Ph.D. Thesis). Univ. Nantes, 268.
  25. Ruocco, 1974, Background noise, Environmental Health, 6
  26. Schomer, 2003, Does the Soundscape concept have real utility, Internoise 2003, 2825
  27. Schulte-Fortkamp, 2002, The meaning of annoyance in relation to the quality of acoustic environments, Noise and Health, 4, 13
  28. Skanberg, 2002, Adverse health effects in relation to urban residential soundscapes, J. Sound Vib., 250, 151, 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3894 · doi:10.1006/jsvi.2001.3894
  29. Stockfelt, 1991, Sound as an existential necessity, J. Sound Vib., 151, 367, 10.1016/0022-460X(91)90533-P · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(91)90533-p
  30. Susini, 1998, Caractérisation perceptive de bruits, Acoustique et Techniques, 13, 11
  31. Vogel, C (1999) Etude sémiotique et acoustique de l’identification des signaux d’avertissement en contexte urbain. (Ph.D. Thesis). Univ. Paris VI, 223.

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Raimbault, M., & Dubois, D.
Venue
Cities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
339-350
ISSN
0264-2751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131030868
Cited by
317
References
14
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urban soundscapes: Experiences and knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cities.2005.05.003
The paper
Raimbault, M., & Dubois, D. (2005). Urban soundscapes: Experiences and knowledge. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.05.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.