CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16

Taking a territorological perspective on place branding?

Warnaby, Gary·2018·Cities
DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This research contributes to territorology and place scholarship more broadly as one of the few studies applying the territory concept to retailing and the only known study to do so within a fashion context.

    “Finally, this research contributes to territorology and place scholarship more broadly (Brighenti, 2010(Brighenti, , 2014;;Kärrholm, 2012) as one of the few studies applying the territory concept to retailing (Warnaby, 2018) and the only known study to do so within a fashion context.”

    From Retail futures: Customer experience, phygital retailing, and the Experiential Retail Territories perspective (2025) · cites this paper as Warnaby, 2018

    The Introduction and Conclusion describe Warnaby (2018) as applying territoriality to place branding, not retailing. The ‘Taking a territorological perspective’ section explicitly identifies place branding as its sphere of application. The citation is attached to the claim that this is a study applying the territory concept to retailing; the separate fashion-context claim is not attributed to Warnaby. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Agnew, J. (2009). Territoriality. In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. J. Watts & S. Whatmore (Eds.), The Dictionary of Human Geography (5 th Edition) (pp. 744-745). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  2. Baxter, J., Kerr, G. & Clarke, R. J. (2013). Brand orientation and the voices from within. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(9-10), 1079-1098.
  3. Boisen, M., Terlouw, K. and van Grop, B. (2011). The selective nature of place branding and the layering of spatial identities. Journal of Place Management and Development, 4(2), 135-147.
  4. Braun, E., Kavaratzis, M. & Zenker, S. (2013). My city-my brand: The different roles of residents in place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(1), 18-28
  5. Brighenti, A.M. (2010). On territorology: Towards a general science of territory. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(1), 52-72.
  6. Brighenti, A.M. (2014). Mobilizing territories, territorializing mobilities. Sociologica, 8(1): 1-25.
  7. Forsberg, H., Medway, D. & Warnaby, G. (1999). Town centre management by co-operation: Evidence from Sweden' Cities, 16(5), 315-322.
  8. Hankinson, G. (2003). Relational network brands: Towards a conceptual model of place brands. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 10(2), 109-121.
  9. Hospers, G-J. (2006). Borders, bridges and branding: the transformation of the Øresund region into an imagined space. European Planning Studies, 14(10), 15-33
  10. Kärrholm, M. (2007). The materiality of territorial production. Space & Culture, 10(4), 437-453.
  11. Karrholm, M. (2008). The territorialisation of a pedestrian precinct in Malmö: Materialities in the commercialisation of public space. Urban Studies, 45(9), 1903-1924.
  12. Kavaratzis, M. & Kalandides, A. (2015). Rethinking the place brand: The interactive formation of place brand and the role of participatory place branding. Environment and Planning A, 47(6), 1368- 1382.
  13. Merrilees, B., Miller, D., & Herington, C. (2012). Multiple stakeholders and multiple city brand meanings. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 1032-1047.
  14. Paasi, A. (2002). Bounded spaces in the mobile world: deconstructing regional identity. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(2), 137-148.
  15. Paasi, A. (2010). Regions as social constructs, but who or what 'constructs' them? Agency in question. Environment and Planning A, 42(10), 2296-2301.
  16. Stubbs, J. & Warnaby G. (2015). Working with stakeholders: Rethinking place branding from a practice perspective. In M. Kavaratzis, G. Warnaby, & G. Ashworth (Eds.) Rethinking Place Branding: Comprehensive Brand Development for Cities and Regions (pp. 101-118).Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
  17. Sudjic, D. (2016). The Language of Cities. London: Penguin Books.
  18. Van den Berg, L. & Braun, E. (1999). Urban competitiveness, marketing and the need for organising capacity. Urban Studies, 36(5-6), 987-999.
  19. Ward, K G. (2000). From rentiers to rantiers: 'active entrepreneurs', 'structural speculators' and the politics of marketing the city. Urban Studies, 37(7), 1093-1107.
  20. Warnaby, G., Bennison, D. & Medway, D. (2010). Notions of materiality and linearity: The challenges of marketing the Hadrian's Wall place product. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1365- 1382.
  21. Warnaby, G. & Medway, D. (2013). What about the 'place' in place marketing? Marketing Theory, 13(3), 345-363.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warnaby, G.
Venue
Cities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
80
Pages
64-66
ISSN
0264-2751
DOI
10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.002
Cited by
16
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review