The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic selection methods for crop improvement: Current status and prospects
Open accessAbstract
With marker and phenotype information from observed populations, genomic selection (GS) can be used to establish associations between markers and phenotypes. It aims to use genome-wide markers to estimate the effects of all loci and thereby predict the genetic values of untested populations, so as to achieve more comprehensive and reliable selection and to accelerate genetic progress in crop breeding. GS models usually face the problem that the number of markers is much higher than the number of phenotypic observations. To overcome this issue and improve prediction accuracy, many models and algorithms, including GBLUP, Bayes, and machine learning have been employed for GS. As hot issues in GS research, the estimation of non-additive genetic effects and the combined analysis of multiple traits or multiple environments are also important for improving the accuracy of prediction. In recent years, crop breeding has taken advantage of the development of GS. The principles and characteristics of current popular GS methods and research progress in these methods for crop improvement are reviewed in this paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i01 · Cited by 19,927
Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · Cited by 7,917
Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions
VanRaden, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980 · Cited by 6,050
Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height
Yang, J., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B. P., Gordon, S., Henders, A. K., Nyholt, D. R., Madden, P. A., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., Montgomery, G. W., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.608 · Cited by 4,446
Park, T., & Casella, G. (2008) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214508000000337 · Cited by 2,934
Best Linear Unbiased Estimation and Prediction under a Selection Model
Henderson, C. R. (1975) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529430 · Cited by 2,497
Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives
Crossa, J., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., Cuevas, J., Montesinos-López, O., Jarquín, D., de los Campos, G., Burgueño, J., González-Camacho, J. M., Pérez-Elizalde, S., Beyene, Y., et al. (2017) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.011 · Cited by 1,839
Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits.
Lande, R., & Thompson, R. (1990) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/124.3.743 · Cited by 1,410
The Impact of Genetic Relationship Information on Genome-Assisted Breeding Values
Habier, D., Fernando, R. L., & Dekkers, J. C. M. (2007) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.081190 · Cited by 1,320
Cited by
Enhancing Genetic Gain through Genomic Selection: From Livestock to Plants
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Fu, J., Wang, H., Wang, J., Huang, C., Prasanna, B. M., Olsen, M. S., Wang, G., & Zhang, A. (2020) · Plant Communications · doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2019.100005 · Cited by 281
Self-citationGene pyramiding for sustainable crop improvement against biotic and abiotic stresses
Dormatey, R., Sun, C., Ali, K., Coulter, J. A., Bi, Z., & Bai, J. (2020) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy10091255 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Xu, Y., Hu, Z., & Xu, C.
- Venue
- The Crop Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 330-340
- ISSN
- 2095-5421 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-5141
- OpenAlex
- W2802145818
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 15.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic selection methods for crop improvement: Current status and prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cj.2018.03.001
- The paper
- Wang, X., Xu, Y., Hu, Z., & Xu, C. (2018). Genomic selection methods for crop improvement: Current status and prospects. The Crop Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2018.03.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
