Automatic production of end user documentation for DSLs
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple galleries together help users select a suitable library by comparison.
“Multiple galleries together help users select a suitable library by comparison [28], [55].”
From Considering Visualization Example Galleries (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Kruchten et al. [28] explore metrics for a particular form of gallery, but their connection to utility is unknown.
“Kruchten et al. [28] explore metrics for a particular form of gallery, but their connection to utility is unknown.”
From Considering Visualization Example Galleries (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Considering Visualization Example Galleries
Yang, J., McNutt, A. M., & Battle, L. (2024) · 2024 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) · doi:10.1109/vl/hcc60511.2024.00043 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Studies have explored how documentation might be enhanced by supporting sustainable maintenance [22], annotation [21], automated creation [10], [17], [29], enhancements to the development environment [35], [47], among others.”
Background
- Authors
- Le Moulec, G., Blouin, A., Gouranton, V., & Arnaldi, B.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Computer Languages, Systems & Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 54
- Pages
- 337-357
- ISSN
- 0096-0551 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-8424
- OpenAlex
- W2783880715
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.inria.fr
- Licence
- Locations
- Computer Languages (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
- Keywords
- domain-specific languages, automatic documentation generation, API documentation, Xtext
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review