Cited by 71Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlDiabetes Management and ResearchAdvanced Glycation End Products research

Direct enzymatic assay for %HbA1c in human whole blood samples

Liu, Limin, Hood, Stefanie, Wang, Yuping, Bezverkov, Robert, Dou, Chao, Datta, Abhijit, Yuan, Chong·2008·Clinical Biochemistry

Abstract

Objectives Development and validation of a direct enzymatic HbA1c assay that utilizes a single channel on chemistry auto-analyzers without the need to run separate glycated hemoglobin and total hemoglobin assays. Design and methods An enzyme based single channel assay was developed to measure %HbA1c in human whole blood samples. The performance characteristics of the Diazyme Direct Enzymatic HbA1c Assay were evaluated on the Hitachi 917 auto-analyzer using whole blood samples, appropriate controls and a reference lot of manufactured reagents. Accuracy studies were completed by comparing the Direct Enzymatic Assay to existing HPLC and immunoassay methods. Interference testing was performed to determine the effect of total hemoglobin, glycated serum proteins, chemical substances and hemoglobin variants in patient samples. Results The Direct Enzymatic HbA1c Assay showed within run precision and total precision results of < or = 2% CV for both normal and abnormal level samples. Method comparison studies showed that there was a good correlation between the Direct Enzymatic HbA1c and the HPLC (R(2)=0.98) or the immunoassay (R(2)=0.97) methods. The assay measured within the range of 4-16% HbA1c and showed excellent performance with variant hemoglobin in samples. Conclusions Diazyme Direct Enzymatic HbA1c Assay is accurate and precise when compared to currently marketed medical devices. The assay is designed to report %HbA1c values directly without need for a separate measurement of total hemoglobin and is not adversely affected by interferences from common hemoglobin variants in samples. It is a cost effective, user-friendly method and is adaptable to most general chemistry analyzers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.01.013

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enzymatic methods are widely used in centralized laboratories and rely on endoglycosidase digestion followed by quantification of released glycated amino acids.

    “In addition, although enzymatic methods are widely used in centralized laboratories and rely on endoglycosidase digestion followed by quantification of released glycated amino acids, no studies of enzymatic POC platforms met our inclusion criteria (42-44).”

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L., Hood, S., Wang, Y., Bezverkov, R., Dou, C., Datta, A., & Yuan, C.
Affiliations
Diazyme (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Chong
Venue
Clinical Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
41
Issue
7-8
Pages
576-583
ISSN
0009-9120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016786392
Cited by
71
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
Keywords
HbA1c, enzyme activity assay, whole blood, assay validation, method comparison, HPLC, immunoassay, hemoglobin variants, assay interference, diabetes monitoring
MeSH terms
Blood Chemical Analysis, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review