Cited by 204Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone Metabolism and DiseasesBone health and treatments

Bone turnover markers in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Brown, Jacques P., Albert, Caroline, Nassar, Bassam A., Adachi, Jonathan D., Cole, David, Davison, K. Shawn, Dooley, Kent C., Don-Wauchope, Andrew +14 more·2009·Clinical Biochemistry

Abstract

Osteoporosis is the most common cause of fragility fractures. Bone remodelling is essential for repairing damaged areas within bone to preserve bone strength and for assisting in mineral homeostases. In young adults, bone remodelling is usually balanced with approximately as much bone replaced as is removed during each remodelling cycle. However, when remodelling becomes accelerated in combination with an imbalance that favours bone resorption over formation, such as during menopause, precipitous losses in bone mass occur. Bone turnover markers (BTMs) measure the rate of bone remodelling allowing for a dynamic assessment of skeletal status and hold promise in identifying those at highest risk of rapid bone loss and subsequent fracture. Further, the use of BTMs to monitor individuals administered osteoporosis therapy is attractive as monitoring anti-fracture efficacy with bone mineral density has significant limitations. This review details remodelling biology, pre-analytical and analytical sources of variability for BTMs, describes the most commonly used resorption and formation markers, and offers some guidelines for their use and interpretation in the laboratory and the clinic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.04.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 131 · Cited by 204

Authors
Brown, J. P., Albert, C., Nassar, B. A., Adachi, J. D., Cole, D., Davison, K. S., Dooley, K. C., Don-Wauchope, A., Douville, P., Hanley, D. A., Jamal, S. A., Josse, R., Kaiser, S., Krahn, J., Krause, R., Kremer, R., Lepage, R., Letendre, E., Morin, S., Ooi, D. S., Papaioaonnou, A., & Ste-Marie, L.-G.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Brown, Jacques P.
Venue
Clinical Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
42
Issue
10-11
Pages
929-942
ISSN
0009-9120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034131055
Cited by
204
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Osteoporosis Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
Keywords
bone turnover markers, postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone remodeling, bone resorption, bone formation, fragility fractures, bone mineral density, pre-analytical variability, analytical variability, menopause, fracture risk
MeSH terms
Bone Resorption, Female, Humans, Osteogenesis, Biomarkers, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Bone Remodeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review