Cited by 13Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis

The prognostic value of nitrotyrosine levels in coronary heart disease: long-term evaluation in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry Strategy (ERICO study)

Quidim, Alessandra V.L., Bruno, Tatiana, Leocádio, Paola Caroline Lacerda, Santos, Itamar S., Alvarez-Leite, Jacqueline Isaura, dos Reis Menta, Penélope Lacrísio, Lotufo, Paulo A., Benseñor, Isabela M. +1 more·2019·Clinical Biochemistry

Abstract

Introduction We aimed to analyze the association of nitrotyrosine (N-TYR) levels and long-term survival in an ongoing coronary heart disease (CHD) prospective cohort, the Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry Strategy (ERICO study). Methods N-TYR levels collected during acute and subacute phase from onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) symptoms (myocardial infarction and unstable angina) were evaluated in 342 patients. We calculated case-fatality rates (180-days, 1 year, 2 years and 4 years) and survival analyses up to 4 years using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression with respective cumulative hazard ratios (95% confidence interval; 95%CI), according to N-TYR tertiles up to 4 years of follow-up. Models are presented as crude, age and sex-adjusted and further adjusted for lipids and other confounders. Results Overall, median level of N-TYR was 208.33 nmol/l (range: 3.09 to 1500 nmol/l), regardless ACS subtype. During follow-up of 4 years, we observed 44 (12.9%) deaths. Overall survival rate was 298 (87.1%) (Survival days: 1353, 95%CI: 1320-1387 days). N-TYR levels did not associate with mortality / survival rates up to 4 years. Conclusions No relationship was found between N-TYR levels and mortality rates after ACS during 4-year follow-up in the ERICO study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.02.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 37 · Cited by 13

Authors
Quidim, A. V. L., Bruno, T., Leocádio, P. C. L., Santos, I. S., Alvarez-Leite, J. I., dos Reis Menta, P. L., Lotufo, P. A., Benseñor, I. M., & Goulart, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Corresponding author
Goulart, Alessandra C.
Venue
Clinical Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
66
Pages
37-43
ISSN
0009-9120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913597484
Cited by
13
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Keywords
nitrotyrosine, coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, long-term survival, mortality, prognostic factors, oxidative stress
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Tyrosine, Biomarkers, Survival Rate, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Acute Coronary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review