The prognostic value of nitrotyrosine levels in coronary heart disease: long-term evaluation in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry Strategy (ERICO study)
Abstract
Introduction We aimed to analyze the association of nitrotyrosine (N-TYR) levels and long-term survival in an ongoing coronary heart disease (CHD) prospective cohort, the Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry Strategy (ERICO study). Methods N-TYR levels collected during acute and subacute phase from onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) symptoms (myocardial infarction and unstable angina) were evaluated in 342 patients. We calculated case-fatality rates (180-days, 1 year, 2 years and 4 years) and survival analyses up to 4 years using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression with respective cumulative hazard ratios (95% confidence interval; 95%CI), according to N-TYR tertiles up to 4 years of follow-up. Models are presented as crude, age and sex-adjusted and further adjusted for lipids and other confounders. Results Overall, median level of N-TYR was 208.33 nmol/l (range: 3.09 to 1500 nmol/l), regardless ACS subtype. During follow-up of 4 years, we observed 44 (12.9%) deaths. Overall survival rate was 298 (87.1%) (Survival days: 1353, 95%CI: 1320-1387 days). N-TYR levels did not associate with mortality / survival rates up to 4 years. Conclusions No relationship was found between N-TYR levels and mortality rates after ACS during 4-year follow-up in the ERICO study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients with acute coronary syndrome, there is no relationship between 3-NT levels and mortality during 4 years of follow-up (serum, ELISA).
“No relationship between 3-NT and mortality during 4-years of follow-up”
From Protein oxidation - Formation mechanisms, detection and relevance as biomarkers in human diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [245]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 37 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Quidim, A. V. L., Bruno, T., Leocádio, P. C. L., Santos, I. S., Alvarez-Leite, J. I., dos Reis Menta, P. L., Lotufo, P. A., Benseñor, I. M., & Goulart, A. C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Goulart, Alessandra C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 37-43
- ISSN
- 0009-9120 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2913597484
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
- Keywords
- nitrotyrosine, coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, long-term survival, mortality, prognostic factors, oxidative stress
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Tyrosine, Biomarkers, Survival Rate, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Acute Coronary Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review