Cited by 25Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Static postural sway of women with and without fibromyalgia syndrome: A cross-sectional study

Trevisan, Deborah Colucci, Driusso, Patricia, Avila, Mariana Arias, Gramani-Say, Karina, Moreira, Fernando Manuel Araujo, Parizotto, Nivaldo Antonio·2017·Clinical Biomechanics

Abstract

Background There is a frequent complaint about balance problems among fibromyalgia syndrome patients; however, there are not enough studies that have shown static postural sway of women with fibromyalgia syndrome. This study aimed to compare static postural sway of women with and without fibromyalgia syndrome. Methods This is a cross-sectional study in which twenty-nine women with fibromyalgia syndrome and 20 without took part. A posturography evaluation was performed in six different situations (bipedal, right tandem and left tandem, with eyes opened and closed), and questionnaires for clinical depression symptoms, clinical anxiety symptoms, sleep quality, and Visual Analogue Scales for Pain and Fatigue were applied. Mann-Whitney U test was used to check differences among groups; Wilcoxon matched-pair test was used to check differences intragroup; Cohen d coefficient was used to measure effect sizes and Pearson Correlation Coefficient was used for correlations among variables. Level of significance adopted was 5%. Findings Women with fibromyalgia syndrome have presented worse postural sway than women without fibromyalgia syndrome in all situations (P Interpretation Women with fibromyalgia syndrome have worse performance in the static posture test, more prominent in reduced support bases with eyes closed. Pain, fatigue, depression and anxiety may have directly influenced postural sway in fibromyalgia syndrome patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.03.011

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trevisan, D. C., Driusso, P., Avila, M. A., Gramani-Say, K., Moreira, F. M. A., & Parizotto, N. A.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
Venue
Clinical Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
44
Pages
83-89
ISSN
0268-0033 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2597816019
Cited by
25
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
São Paulo Research Foundation (2011/22122-5)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
fibromyalgia, balance, posturography, women, tandem stance, eyes closed, pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety, sleep quality
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Postural Balance, Fatigue, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review