Cited by 17Cerebrovascular and genetic disordersMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesVasculitis and related conditions

Multiple sclerosis or “inflammatory CADASIL?”: Case Report and review of the literature

Schiess, N., Huether, K., Szolics, M., Agarwal, G., El-Hattab, A.W., Sathe, S.·2018·Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

Abstract

Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) and CADASIL presenting together is exceedingly rare. As more cases of "inflammatory" CADASIL emerge, diagnostic challenges for clinicians increase. We report an individual with MS and CADASIL presenting with cognitive decline at age 25. She presented with gadolinium enhancing lesions on MRI and inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid raising the question of whether these patients should be given a diagnosis of "inflammatory CADASIL" or both MS and CADASIL. Methods A literature review was conducted on reports of inflammatory CADASIL or MS and CADASIL, clinical presentations including spinal cord lesions and CSF inflammatory markers. Results Nine cases in the literature of individuals with CADASIL and inflammatory presentations were found with treatment varying from intravenous steroids to MS immunomodulatory therapy. Conclusions If individuals with CADASIL present with immune mediated inflammatory components they may benefit from immunomodulatory therapy. This is discussed with a review of the inflammatory CADASIL/MS cases in the literature and report of a case.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 17

Authors
Schiess, N., Huether, K., Szolics, M., Agarwal, G., El-Hattab, A. W., & Sathe, S.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Schiess, N.
Venue
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
173
Pages
196-199
ISSN
0303-8467 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793997254
Cited by
17
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, CADASIL, combined diagnosis, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, intravenous corticosteroids, immunomodulatory therapy, cognitive decline, young adults, spinal cord lesions
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiple Sclerosis, Biomarkers, CADASIL, Immunomodulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review