Artificial intelligence for assisting diagnostics and assessment of Parkinson’s disease—A review
Abstract
Artificial intelligence, specifically machine learning, has found numerous applications in computer-aided diagnostics, monitoring and management of neurodegenerative movement disorders of parkinsonian type. These tasks are not trivial due to high inter-subject variability and similarity of clinical presentations of different neurodegenerative disorders in the early stages. This paper aims to give a comprehensive, high-level overview of applications of artificial intelligence through machine learning algorithms in kinematic analysis of movement disorders, specifically Parkinson's disease (PD). We surveyed papers published between January 2007 and January 2019, within online databases, including PubMed and Science Direct, with a focus on the most recently published studies. The search encompassed papers dealing with the implementation of machine learning algorithms for diagnosis and assessment of PD using data describing motion of upper and lower extremities. This systematic review presents an overview of 48 relevant studies published in the abovementioned period, which investigate the use of artificial intelligence for diagnostics, therapy assessment and progress prediction in PD based on body kinematics. Different machine learning algorithms showed promising results, particularly for early PD diagnostics. The investigated publications demonstrated the potentials of collecting data from affordable and globally available devices. However, to fully exploit artificial intelligence technologies in the future, more widespread collaboration is advised among medical institutions, clinicians and researchers, to facilitate aligning of data collection protocols, sharing and merging of data sets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ML algorithms have been instrumental in monitoring and managing chronic diseases like Parkinson's and multiple sclerosis.
“Moreover, ML algorithms have been instrumental in monitoring and managing chronic diseases, like Parkinson’s and multiple sclerosis [187,188].”
From The emergence of AI-based wearable sensors for digital health technology: a review (2023) · cites this paper as [187]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 194
- Authors
- Belić, M., Bobić, V., Badža, M., Šolaja, N., Đurić-Jovičić, M., & Kostić, V. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- Venue
- Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 184
- Pages
- 105442
- ISSN
- 0303-8467 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2961064073
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Keywords
- Parkinson's disease, artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer-aided diagnosis, kinematic analysis, movement disorders, early diagnosis, treatment evaluation, disease progression prediction, wearable sensors, lower extremity movement, upper limb movement, data sharing
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Movement, Parkinson Disease, Databases, Factual
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review