Cited by 194Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Artificial intelligence for assisting diagnostics and assessment of Parkinson’s disease—A review

Belić, Minja, Bobić, Vladislava, Badža, Milica, Šolaja, Nikola, Đurić-Jovičić, Milica, Kostić, Vladimir S.·2019·Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

Abstract

Artificial intelligence, specifically machine learning, has found numerous applications in computer-aided diagnostics, monitoring and management of neurodegenerative movement disorders of parkinsonian type. These tasks are not trivial due to high inter-subject variability and similarity of clinical presentations of different neurodegenerative disorders in the early stages. This paper aims to give a comprehensive, high-level overview of applications of artificial intelligence through machine learning algorithms in kinematic analysis of movement disorders, specifically Parkinson's disease (PD). We surveyed papers published between January 2007 and January 2019, within online databases, including PubMed and Science Direct, with a focus on the most recently published studies. The search encompassed papers dealing with the implementation of machine learning algorithms for diagnosis and assessment of PD using data describing motion of upper and lower extremities. This systematic review presents an overview of 48 relevant studies published in the abovementioned period, which investigate the use of artificial intelligence for diagnostics, therapy assessment and progress prediction in PD based on body kinematics. Different machine learning algorithms showed promising results, particularly for early PD diagnostics. The investigated publications demonstrated the potentials of collecting data from affordable and globally available devices. However, to fully exploit artificial intelligence technologies in the future, more widespread collaboration is advised among medical institutions, clinicians and researchers, to facilitate aligning of data collection protocols, sharing and merging of data sets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105442

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 194

Authors
Belić, M., Bobić, V., Badža, M., Šolaja, N., Đurić-Jovičić, M., & Kostić, V. S.
Affiliations
University of Belgrade (RS)
Venue
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
184
Pages
105442
ISSN
0303-8467 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2961064073
Cited by
194
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, artificial intelligence, machine learning, computer-aided diagnosis, kinematic analysis, movement disorders, early diagnosis, treatment evaluation, disease progression prediction, wearable sensors, lower extremity movement, upper limb movement, data sharing
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Movement, Parkinson Disease, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review