Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motoneuron excitability: The importance of neuromodulatory inputs

Open access
Heckman, C.J., Mottram, Carol, Quinlan, Kathy, Theiss, Renee, Schuster, Jenna·2009·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

The excitability of spinal motoneurons is both fundamental for motor behavior and essential in diagnosis of neural disorders. There are two mechanisms for altering this excitability. The classic mechanism is mediated by synaptic inputs that depolarize or hyperpolarize motoneurons by generating postsynaptic potentials. This “ionotropic” mechanism works via neurotransmitters that open ion channels in the cell membrane. In the second mechanism, neurotransmitters bind to receptors that activate intracellular signaling pathways. These pathways modulate the properties of the voltage sensitive channels that determine the intrinsic input-output properties of motoneurons. This “neuromodulatory” mechanism usually does not directly activate motoneurons but instead dramatically alters the neuron’s response to ionotropic inputs. We present extensive evidence that neuromodulatory inputs exert a much more powerful effect on motoneuron excitability than ionotropic inputs. The most potent neuromodulators are probably serotonin and norepinephrine, which are released by axons originating in the brainstem and can increase motoneuron excitability 5-fold or more. Thus, the standard tests of motoneuron excitability (H-reflexes, tendon-taps, tendon vibration and stretch reflexes) are strongly influenced by the level of neuromodulatory input to motoneurons. This insight is likely to be profoundly important for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.009

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 140 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Heckman, C. J., Mottram, C., Quinlan, K., Theiss, R., & Schuster, J.
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
120
Issue
12
Pages
2040-2054
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999967173
Cited by
274
References
140
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motoneuron excitability: The importance of neuromodulatory inputs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.009
The paper
Heckman, C. J., Mottram, C., Quinlan, K., Theiss, R., & Schuster, J. (2009). Motoneuron excitability: The importance of neuromodulatory inputs. Clinical Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.