Waiting to perceive: Reward or punishment?
Abstract
Neurobiological accounts of the dopaminergic reward system and psychophysiological explanations of the error-related negativity (ERN) both emphasize the comparison of expected versus actual outcome for voluntary actions. The stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN) constitutes a valuable index of that expectation, in that it has high temporal resolution and its anatomical, cognitive and affective correlates have been reasonably well characterized. This review links established findings regarding the SPN to current research on the dorsal and ventral attention systems, somatic marker hypothesis, ERN, the reward system and relevant neurological and psychiatric findings. Special emphasis is given to the pre-feedback SPN and its origin within anterior insular cortex.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During the anticipation of positive feedback, the PDD-NOS group displayed an atypical stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), an ERP component that is thought to index reward anticipation, similar to the P3.
“Interestingly, however, during the anticipation of positive feedback, the PDD-NOS group displayed an atypical stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), an ERP component that is thought to index reward anticipation, similar to the P3 [102].”
From Social “wanting” dysfunction in autism: neurobiological underpinnings and treatment implications (2012) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 95 · Cited by 176
- Authors
- Brunia, C. H. M., Hackley, S. A., van Boxtel, G. J. M., Kotani, Y., & Ohgami, Y.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Brunia, Cornelis H.M.
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 858-868
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130993752
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- stimulus-preceding negativity, error-related negativity, reward systems, dopaminergic reward, outcome prediction, somatic marker hypothesis, anterior insula, action monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Humans, Functional Laterality, Nerve Net, Punishment, Reward
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
