Cited by 186Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeurological disorders and treatments

A meta-analysis of cortical inhibition and excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatric disorders

Radhu, Natasha, de Jesus, Danilo R., Ravindran, Lakshmi N., Zanjani, Anosha, Fitzgerald, Paul B., Daskalakis, Zafiris J.·2013·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Objective To evaluate transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures of inhibition and excitation in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), major depressive disorder (MDD) and schizophrenia (SCZ).Methods Paradigms included: short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI), cortical silent period (CSP), resting motor threshold, intracortical facilitation, and motor evoked potential amplitude. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase Psychiatry and PsycINFO 1990 through April 2012.Results A significant Hedge's g was found for decreased SICI (g=0.572, 95% confidence interval [0.179, 0.966], p=0.004), enhanced intracortical facilitation (g=0.446, 95% confidence interval [0.042, 0.849], p=0.030) and decreased CSP (g=-0.466, 95% confidence interval [-0.881, -0.052], p=0.027) within the OCD population. For MDD, significant effect sizes were demonstrated for decreased SICI (g=0.641, 95% confidence interval [0.384, 0.898], p=0.000) and shortened CSP (g=-1.232, 95% confidence interval [-1.530, -0.933], p=0.000). In SCZ, a significant Hedge's g was shown for decreased SICI (g=0.476, 95% confidence interval [0.331, 0.620], p=0.000).Conclusion Inhibitory deficits are a ubiquitous finding across OCD, MDD, SCZ and enhancement of intracortical facilitation is specific to OCD.Significance Provides a clear platform from which diagnostic procedures can be developed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 186

Authors
Radhu, N., de Jesus, D. R., Ravindran, L. N., Zanjani, A., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Daskalakis, Z. J.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
124
Issue
7
Pages
1309-1320
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101900692
Cited by
186
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
  • Ontario Mental Health Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
cortical inhibition, cortical excitability, obsessive-compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, short-interval intracortical inhibition, cortical silent period, intracortical facilitation, resting motor threshold, motor evoked potentials, inhibitory deficits, mental illness
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Cortex, Neural Inhibition, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Reaction Time, Schizophrenia, Time Factors, Databases, Factual, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review