Cited by 73Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurological disorders and treatments

Reproducibility of the effects of theta burst stimulation on motor cortical plasticity in healthy participants

Open access
Vernet, Marine, Bashir, Shahid, Yoo, Woo-Kyoung, Oberman, Lindsay, Mizrahi, Ilan, Ifert-Miller, Frederick, Beck, Charles J., Pascual-Leone, Alvaro·2014·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Objective Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol, capable of enhancing or suppressing the amplitude of contralateral motor-evoked potentials (MEP) for several minutes after stimulation over the primary motor cortex. Continuous TBS (cTBS) produces a long-term depression (LTD)-like reduction of cortical excitability. The purpose of this study was to assess the test-retest reproducibility of the effects of cTBS and to investigate which neurophysiologic markers of cTBS-induced plasticity are most reproducible. Methods In ten healthy participants we evaluated in two different sessions the effects of cTBS (using AP-PA current direction, opposite to most commercial rTMS stimulators) on MEPs induced by single-pulse suprathreshold TMS (using AP-PA or PA current direction) over left motor cortex in the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscle. Results Results demonstrate that the marker of cTBS induced-plasticity with highest within-subject reproducibility is the modulation of corticospinal excitability measured 5min after cTBS. Conclusion Overall the effects of cTBS modulation show limited test-retest reproducibility and some measures of the cTBS effects are more reproducible than others. Significance Studies comparing cTBS effects in healthy subjects and patients need to proceed with care. Further characterization of the effects of TBS and identification of the best metrics warrant future studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cTBS paradigm used in this study was recently shown to induce significant suppression of MEPs in healthy controls.

    “This paradigm was recently shown to induce significant suppression of MEPs in healthy controls (see Vernet et al., 2014).”

    From Theta burst stimulation to characterize changes in brain plasticity following mild traumatic brain injury: A proof-of-principle study (2015) · cites this paper as Vernet et al., 2014

    The Results (section 3; page unavailable) say that cTBS suppressed MEPs on average in healthy participants, although some showed the opposite response. The copy does not report that suppression itself was statistically significant; the significance tests in section 3.1 compare visits, not post-cTBS MEPs with baseline. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Continuous TBS has many advantages over other techniques, including short application time, low intensity of stimulation, and reasonable intra-subject reproducibility over two separate sessions.

    “This method has many advantages over other techniques such as its short application time (Huang et al., 2005), low intensity of stimulation (Huang et al., 2005) and reasonable intra-subject reproducibility over two seperate sessions (Vernet et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Cardenas-Morales L Nowak DA Kammer T Wolf RC Schonfeldt-Lecuona C Mechanisms and applications of theta-burst rTMS on the human motor cortex. Brain Topogr 2010 22 294 306 19288184
  2. Cheeran B Talelli P Mori F Koch G Suppa A Edwards M A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS. J Physiol 2008 586 5717 25 18845611 PMC2655403
  3. Chen R Cros D Curra A Di Lazzaro V Lefaucheur JP Magistris MR The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2008 119 504 32 18063409
  4. Di Lazzaro V Pilato F Dileone M Profice P Oliviero A Mazzone P The physiological basis of the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 2008 586 3871 9 18566003 PMC2538925
  5. Di Lazzaro V Pilato F Saturno E Oliviero A Dileone M Mazzone P Theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses specific excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex. J Physiol 2005 565 945 50 15845575 PMC1464561
  6. Doeltgen SH Ridding MC Low-intensity, short-interval theta burst stimulation modulates excitatory but not inhibitory motor networks. Clin Neurophysiol 2011 122 1411 6 21195662
  7. Freitas C Perez J Knobel M Tormos JM Oberman L Eldaief M Changes in cortical plasticity across the lifespan. Front Aging Neurosci 2011 3 5 21519394 PMC3079175
  8. Gentner R Wankerl K Reinsberger C Zeller D Classen J Depression of human corticospinal excitability induced by magnetic theta-burst stimulation: evidence of rapid polarity-reversing metaplasticity. Cereb Cortex 2008 18 2046 53 18165282
  9. Goldsworthy MR Pitcher JB Ridding MC A comparison of two different continuous theta burst stimulation paradigms applied to the human primary motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2012 123 2256 63 22633917
  10. Hamada M Murase N Hasan A Balaratnam M Rothwell JC The Role of Interneuron Networks in Driving Human Motor Cortical Plasticity. Cereb Cortex 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs147 22661405 · DOI
  11. Huang YZ Edwards MJ Rounis E Bhatia KP Rothwell JC Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005 45 201 6 15664172
  12. Huang YZ Rothwell JC Edwards MJ Chen RS Effect of physiological activity on an NMDA-dependent form of cortical plasticity in human. Cereb Cortex 2008 18 563 70 17573373
  13. Iezzi E Conte A Suppa A Agostino R Dinapoli L Scontrini A Phasic voluntary movements reverse the aftereffects of subsequent theta-burst stimulation in humans. J Neurophysiol 2008 100 2070 6 18753328
  14. Li Voti P Conte A Suppa A Iezzi E Bologna M Aniello MS Correlation between cortical plasticity, motor learning and BDNF genotype in healthy subjects. Exp Brain Res 2011 212 91 9 21537966
  15. McAllister SM Rothwell JC Ridding MC Selective modulation of intracortical inhibition by low-intensity Theta Burst Stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2009 120 820 6 19303810
  16. Oberman L Ifert-Miller F Najib U Bashir S Woollacott I Gonzalez-Heydrich J Transcranial magnetic stimulation provides means to assess cortical plasticity and excitability in humans with fragile X syndrome and autism spectrum disorder. Front Synaptic Neurosci 2010 2 1 8 21423512 PMC3059673
  17. Pascual-Leone A Disrupting the brain to guide plasticity and improve behavior. Prog Brain Res 2006 157 315 29 17167918
  18. Pascual-Leone A Freitas C Oberman L Horvath JC Halko M Eldaief M Characterizing brain cortical plasticity and network dynamics across the age-span in health and disease with TMS-EEG and TMS-fMRI. Brain Topogr 2011 24 302 15 21842407 PMC3374641
  19. Ridding MC Ziemann U Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by noninvasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects. J Physiol 2010 588 2291 304 20478978 PMC2915507
  20. Romei V Brodbeck V Michel C Amedi A Pascual-Leone A Thut G Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. Cereb Cortex 2008 18 2010 8 18093905 PMC2517102
  21. Rossini PM Barker AT Berardelli A Caramia MD Caruso G Cracco RQ Noninvasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 1994 91 79 92 7519144
  22. Silvanto J Pascual-Leone A State-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 2008 21 1 10 18791818 PMC3049188
  23. Sommer M Norden C Schmack L Rothkegel H Lang N Paulus W Opposite optimal current flow directions for induction of neuroplasticity and excitation threshold in the human motor cortex. Brain Stimul 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2012.07.003 22885142 · DOI
  24. Suppa A Ortu E Zafar N Deriu F Paulus W Berardelli A Theta burst stimulation induces after-effects on contralateral primary motor cortex excitability in humans. J Physiol 2008 586 4489 500 18669534 PMC2614023
  25. Talelli P Cheeran BJ Teo JT Rothwell JC Pattern-specific role of the current orientation used to deliver Theta Burst Stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2007 118 1815 23 17587641
  26. Zafar N Paulus W Sommer M Comparative assessment of best conventional with best theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols on human motor cortex excitability. Clin Neurophysiol 2008 119 1393 9 18400556

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vernet, M., Bashir, S., Yoo, W.-K., Oberman, L., Mizrahi, I., Ifert-Miller, F., Beck, C. J., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
320-326
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148482283
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Consortia for Improving Medicine with Innovation and Technology
  • Fondation Fyssen
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH080493)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025758, KL2RR025757)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
theta burst stimulation, continuous theta burst stimulation, motor cortical plasticity, test-retest reproducibility, motor evoked potentials, corticospinal excitability, long-term depression, primary motor cortex, first dorsal interosseous muscle, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Neuronal Plasticity, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review