Cited by 234Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Identifying patients with Alzheimer’s disease using resting-state fMRI and graph theory

Khazaee, Ali, Ebrahimzadeh, Ata, Babajani-Feremi, Abbas·2015·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Objective Study of brain network on the basis of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has provided promising results to investigate changes in connectivity among different brain regions because of diseases. Graph theory can efficiently characterize different aspects of the brain network by calculating measures of integration and segregation.Method In this study, we combine graph theoretical approaches with advanced machine learning methods to study functional brain network alteration in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Support vector machine (SVM) was used to explore the ability of graph measures in diagnosis of AD. We applied our method on the resting-state fMRI data of twenty patients with AD and twenty age and gender matched healthy subjects. The data were preprocessed and each subject's graph was constructed by parcellation of the whole brain into 90 distinct regions using the automated anatomical labeling (AAL) atlas. The graph measures were then calculated and used as the discriminating features. Extracted network-based features were fed to different feature selection algorithms to choose most significant features. In addition to the machine learning approach, statistical analysis was performed on connectivity matrices to find altered connectivity patterns in patients with AD.Results Using the selected features, we were able to accurately classify patients with AD from healthy subjects with accuracy of 100%.Conclusion Results of this study show that pattern recognition and graph of brain network, on the basis of the resting state fMRI data, can efficiently assist in the diagnosis of AD.Significance Classification based on the resting-state fMRI can be used as a non-invasive and automatic tool to diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.060

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 234

Authors
Khazaee, A., Ebrahimzadeh, A., & Babajani-Feremi, A.
Affiliations
Babol Noshirvani University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Khazaee, Ali
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
126
Issue
11
Pages
2132-2141
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991933335
Cited by
234
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, resting-state fMRI, brain networks, graph theory, network metrics, functional connectivity, support vector machine, automated anatomical labeling, feature selection, disease diagnosis, network-based classification
MeSH terms
Aged, Algorithms, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Brain Mapping, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Theoretical, Nerve Net, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Rest, Case-Control Studies, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review