Identifying patients with Alzheimer’s disease using resting-state fMRI and graph theory
Abstract
Objective Study of brain network on the basis of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has provided promising results to investigate changes in connectivity among different brain regions because of diseases. Graph theory can efficiently characterize different aspects of the brain network by calculating measures of integration and segregation.Method In this study, we combine graph theoretical approaches with advanced machine learning methods to study functional brain network alteration in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Support vector machine (SVM) was used to explore the ability of graph measures in diagnosis of AD. We applied our method on the resting-state fMRI data of twenty patients with AD and twenty age and gender matched healthy subjects. The data were preprocessed and each subject's graph was constructed by parcellation of the whole brain into 90 distinct regions using the automated anatomical labeling (AAL) atlas. The graph measures were then calculated and used as the discriminating features. Extracted network-based features were fed to different feature selection algorithms to choose most significant features. In addition to the machine learning approach, statistical analysis was performed on connectivity matrices to find altered connectivity patterns in patients with AD.Results Using the selected features, we were able to accurately classify patients with AD from healthy subjects with accuracy of 100%.Conclusion Results of this study show that pattern recognition and graph of brain network, on the basis of the resting state fMRI data, can efficiently assist in the diagnosis of AD.Significance Classification based on the resting-state fMRI can be used as a non-invasive and automatic tool to diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FDR correction is the method of choice to correct for the multiple comparisons problem when using graph theory metrics.
“we employed the FDR correction which is the method of choice to correct for the multiple comparisons problem when using those measures (Agosta et al., 2014; Khazaee et al., 2015).”
From Multiclass characterization of frontotemporal dementia variants via multimodal brain network computational inference (2023) · cites this paper as Khazaee et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 234
- Authors
- Khazaee, A., Ebrahimzadeh, A., & Babajani-Feremi, A.
- Affiliations
- Babol Noshirvani University of Technology (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Khazaee, Ali
- ORCID
- Khazaee, Ali
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2132-2141
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991933335
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, resting-state fMRI, brain networks, graph theory, network metrics, functional connectivity, support vector machine, automated anatomical labeling, feature selection, disease diagnosis, network-based classification
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Algorithms, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Brain Mapping, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Theoretical, Nerve Net, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Rest, Case-Control Studies, Support Vector Machine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review