P071 tDCS effects over the left DLPFC versus the right PPC in multiple sclerosis fatigue
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mattioli et al. (2016) and the DLPFC-condition of Chalah et al. (2017) were identified as outliers in the tDCS executive functioning analysis.
“Mattioli, Bellomi, Stampatori, Capra, and Miniussi (2016) and the DLPFC-condition of Chalah, Créange, Lefaucheur, and Ayache (2017) were both identified as outliers.”
From Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Chalah, Créange, Lefaucheur, and Ayache (2017)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Begemann, M. J., Brand, B. A., Ćurčić-Blake, B., Aleman, A., & Sommer, I. E. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720003670 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chalah, M. A., Créange, A., Lefaucheur, J.-P., & Ayache, S. S.
- Affiliations
- Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Ayache, S.S.
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e39-e40
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2588748775
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, anodal stimulation, mood, attention, non-invasive brain stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
