Cited by 17Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Atypical auditory language processing in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder

Tanigawa, Junpei, Kagitani-Shimono, Kuriko, Matsuzaki, Junko, Ogawa, Rei, Hanaie, Ryuzo, Yamamoto, Tomoka, Tominaga, Koji, Nabatame, Shin +3 more·2018·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Objective Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often show characteristic differences in auditory processing. To clarify the mechanisms underlying communication impairment in ASD, we examined auditory language processing with both anatomical and functional methods. Methods We assessed the language abilities of adolescents with ASD and typically developing (TD) adolescents, and analyzed the surface-based morphometric structure between the groups using magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, we measured cortical responses to an auditory word comprehension task with magnetoencephalography and performed network-based statistics using the phase locking values. Results We observed no structural differences between the groups. However, the volume of the left ventral central sulcus (vCS) showed a significant correlation with linguistic scores in ASD. Moreover, adolescents with ASD showed weaker cortical activation in the left vCS and superior temporal sulcus. Furthermore, these regions showed differential correlations with linguistic scores between the groups. Moreover, the ASD group had an atypical gamma band (25-40 Hz) network centered on the left vCS. Conclusions Adolescents with ASD showed atypical responses on the auditory word comprehension task and functional brain differences. Significance Our results suggest that phonological processing and gamma band cortical activity play a critical role in auditory language processing-related pathophysiology in adolescents with ASD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.05.014

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanigawa, J., Kagitani-Shimono, K., Matsuzaki, J., Ogawa, R., Hanaie, R., Yamamoto, T., Tominaga, K., Nabatame, S., Mohri, I., Taniike, M., & Ozono, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Molecular Research Center for Children's Mental Development (JP)
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
129
Issue
9
Pages
2029-2037
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807276919
Cited by
17
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP26870333, JP23591394)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, auditory language processing, adolescents, superior temporal sulcus, gamma oscillations, phonological processing, cortical activation, brain network analysis, phase locking, communication disorders
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Auditory Perception, Auditory Perceptual Disorders, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Magnetoencephalography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review