An update on retinal prostheses
Open accessAbstract
Retinal prostheses are designed to restore a basic sense of sight to people with profound vision loss. They require a relatively intact posterior visual pathway (optic nerve, lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex). Retinal implants are options for people with severe stages of retinal degenerative disease such as retinitis pigmentosa and age-related macular degeneration. There have now been three regulatory-approved retinal prostheses. Over five hundred patients have been implanted globally over the past 15 years. Devices generally provide an improved ability to localize high-contrast objects, navigate, and perform basic orientation tasks. Adverse events have included conjunctival erosion, retinal detachment, loss of light perception, and the need for revision surgery, but are rare. There are also specific device risks, including overstimulation (which could cause damage to the retina) or delamination of implanted components, but these are very unlikely. Current challenges include how to improve visual acuity, enlarge the field-of-view, and reduce a complex visual scene to its most salient components through image processing. This review encompasses the work of over 40 individual research groups who have built devices, developed stimulation strategies, or investigated the basic physiology underpinning retinal prostheses. Current technologies are summarized, along with future challenges that face the field.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Due to the considerable distance from BCs, high current amplitudes are required for retinal stimulation, possibly leading to damage due to overstimulation.
“Due to the considerable distance from BCs, high current amplitudes are required for retinal stimulation, possibly leading to damage due to overstimulation [35,61].”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
Leads-wires breakage is common and leads to malfunctioning or not functioning of the device.
“Leads-wires breakage is common [35] and leads to malfunctioning or not functioning of the device.”
From Advances in visual prostheses: engineering and biological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 131 · Cited by 223
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bajaj R, Sadeghi R, Barry MP, Gibson P, Caspi A, Roy A, Seeing heat: Efficacy of a thermal camera in the Argus II retinal prosthesis system. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 2019; 60(9): 4017 (e-abstract).
- Foerster O Contributions to the pathophysiology of the visual pathway and visual sphere. J Psychol Neurol 1929; 39: 435– 63.
- Lauritzen TZ, Nanduri D, Weiland J, Dorn JD, McClure K, Greenberg R, Interelectrode discriminability correlates with spatial visual performance in Argus II subjects. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 2011; 52: 4927.
- Stanga PE, Sahel JA Jr, daCruz L, Hafezi F, Merlini F, Coley B, Patients blinded by outer retinal dystrophies are able to perceive simultaneous colors using the Argus® II Retinal Prosthesis System. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 2012; 53: 6952-.
- Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Chee CK, Cottriall CL, Gekeler F, Subretinal visual implant alpha IMS - clinical trial interim report. Vision Res 2015b; 111: 149– 60. 25812924
- Authors
- Ayton, L. N., Barnes, N., Dagnelie, G., Fujikado, T., Goetz, G., Hornig, R., Jones, B. W., Muqit, M. M. K., Rathbun, D. L., Stingl, K., Weiland, J. D., & Petoe, M. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Australian National University (AU)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Verily Life Sciences LLC (United States) (US)
- Pixium Vision (France) (FR)
- University of Utah (US)
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Henry Ford Health (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Bionics Institute (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Ayton, Lauren N.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1383-1398
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7198351
- OpenAlex
- W2994736635
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 9 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H05487, 18H04116, 18K19616)
- National Eye Institute (R01EY015128, R01EY028927, P30EY014800)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- retinal prosthesis, retinitis pigmentosa, age-related macular degeneration, vision restoration, visual pathway integrity, stimulation strategies, image processing, adverse events, field of view, visual acuity
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Vision Disorders, Treatment Outcome, Visual Prosthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review