Cited by 66Liver Diseases and ImmunityLiver physiology and pathologyPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments

Will we ever model PSC? – “It's hard to be a PSC model!”

Pollheimer, Marion J., Trauner, Michael, Fickert, Peter·2011·Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology

Abstract

Cholangiopathies such as primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) represent an important group of liver diseases of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts frequently causing end-stage liver disease with significant morbidity and mortality due to limited treatment options. The relatively low incidence of PSC and the difficult accessibility of the human bile duct system for longitudinal studies may represent some of the critical reasons for the lack of profound knowledge in regard to PSC pathophysiology. Therefore, there is an urgent need for reliable, well-defined and easily reproducible animal models to learn more about the pathophysiology of PSC and to test novel treatment modalities. In an ideal world, immunogenetically predisposed animals would develop fibrous-obliterative cholangitis of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts in association with inflammation of the gut (especially colitis) in a highly reproducible manner allowing to test new drugs. To date, however, no such animal model is available. We aimed to provide a systematic overview of current available rodent models for sclerosing cholangitis and biliary fibrosis and therefore critically analyzed the characteristics of models for chemically-induced cholangitis, knock-out mouse models with cholangitis, cholangitis induced by infectious agents, models of experimental biliary obstruction, models involving enteric bacterial cell-wall components or colitis, and models of primary biliary epithelial and endothelial cell injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.04.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current consensus is that there is not a unique animal model fully recapitulating human cholestatic disease.

    “Based on the complexity of the multiple molecular events undergoing during cholestasis, involving interactions between different liver cell types and the gut-microbiome-liver axis, the current consensus is that there is not a unique animal model fully recapitulating human cholestatic disease20.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 66

Authors
Pollheimer, M. J., Trauner, M., & Fickert, P.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Fickert, Peter
Venue
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
35
Issue
12
Pages
792-804
ISSN
2210-7401 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975910137
Cited by
66
References
70
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
primary sclerosing cholangitis, animal models, rodent models, biliary fibrosis, cholangitis, knockout mouse models, colitis, gut-liver axis, endothelial injury, drug testing
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Cholangitis, Sclerosing, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review