The DOI matches its Crossref record.
One-Year assessment of joint procurement of pharmaceuticals in the public health sector in Jordan
Abstract
Background About 10% of the gross domestic product in Jordan is spent on health care, and almost one third of that is spent on pharmaceuticals. The public health sector in Jordan has 4 main governmental parties that purchase medicines independently through annual tenders (ie, the process of bidding, being awarded, ordering, paying for, and receiving drugs) issued in the generic (or scientific) name of the medicines or therapeutic groups. Double purchasing is a problem that leads to higher spending on drugs and poor availability of medicines throughout the year. To remedy this problem, a joint procurement process was established in Jordan in 2004 and went into practice in 2006. Objective The aim of this research was to assess the first year of purchasing pharmaceuticals in the public health sector in Jordan through the joint procurement process for the 4 participating parties in comparison with purchasing pharmaceuticals independently before the institution of joint procurement. Methods The first tender under the joint procurement process was issued in 2007 for antibiotics, anti-HIV medications, and antituberculosis agents, which represent 15% of the annual pharmaceutical public-sector purchases in Jordan. A research committee solicited lists of purchased quantities and final purchase prices of these pharmaceuticals obtained in 2006 by each participating group and in 2007 through the joint procurement process. The quantity-comparison method was used to compare the costs of drugs purchased in 2006 and 2007, and estimated cost savings were calculated for each product for each party for 2006 and 2007 under the assumption that the same quantities purchased by each participating party in 2006 would be purchased through joint procurement (prices of 2007). Results Purchasing through the joint procurement process achieved an estimated savings of 2.4%. This savings increased to 8.9% after excluding 1 item (a cephalosporin), the raw material price of which increased markedly in 2007 compared with 2006 because of an international shortage of raw materials. Conclusion Based on these initial findings, applying a joint procurement system for pharmaceuticals in the public health sector in Jordan has potential to reduce expenditures for the purchase of medicines and provide treatment continuously throughout the year.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In Jordan, a Joint Procurement Directorate bids for drugs across four different government agencies, and this programme achieved 5.2–17% cost savings on drugs procured.19 20”
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Alabbadi, 2006, Impact of Modified System of Objectified Judgement Analysis (SOJA) methodology on prescribing costs of ACE inhibitors, Clin Drug Investig., 26, 485, 10.2165/00044011-200626090-00001 · DOI
- Midlöv, 2008, Clinical outcomes from the use of Medication Report when elderly patients are discharged from hospital, Pharm World Sci., 30, 840, 10.1007/s11096-008-9236-1 · DOI
- Pilote, 2004, Mortality rates in elderly patients who take different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction: A class effect?, Ann Intern Med., 141, 102, 10.7326/0003-4819-141-2-200407200-00008 · DOI
- Wazaify, 2008, Societal perspectives on the role of community pharmacists and over-the-counter drugs in Jordan, Pharm World Sci., 30, 884, 10.1007/s11096-008-9244-1 · DOI
- Kersnik, 2006, Attitudes of Slovene general practitioners towards generic drug prescribing and comparison with international studies, J Clin Pharm Ther., 31, 577, 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2006.00776.x · DOI
- Souza, 2008, Medicine consumption and the Internet: Critical evaluation of a virtual community [in Portuguese], Rev Assoc Med Bras, 54, 225, 10.1590/S0104-42302008000300015 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Seidman, G., & Atun, R. (2017) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000243 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Abbadi, I., Qawwas, A., Jaafreh, M., Abosamen, T., & Saket, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Jordan (JO)
- Venue
- Clinical Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1335-1344
- ISSN
- 0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161005495
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Keywords
- joint purchasing, drug procurement, public health sector, cost reduction, antibiotics, antiretroviral drugs, antitubercular agents, raw material shortages, drug availability, Jordan
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antitubercular Agents, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Jordan, Pilot Projects, Drug Costs, Cost Savings, Public Sector, Group Purchasing, Anti-HIV Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One-Year assessment of joint procurement of pharmaceuticals in the public health sector in Jordan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.021
- The paper
- Al-Abbadi, I., Qawwas, A., Jaafreh, M., Abosamen, T., & Saket, M. (2009). One-Year assessment of joint procurement of pharmaceuticals in the public health sector in Jordan. Clinical Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.021