Cited by 72Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its active metabolite, d-amphetamine, with increasing oral doses of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A single-dose, randomized, open-label, crossover study

Boellner, Samuel W., Stark, Jeffrey G., Krishnan, Suma, Zhang, Yuxin·2010·Clinical Therapeutics

Abstract

Background Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting oral prodrug stimulant indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children 6 to 12 years old and in adults. Information on the pharmacokinetic profile of LDX in children with ADHD is lacking.Objective The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic properties of d-amphetamine delivery from LDX, and intact LDX with increasing doses of LDX administered in children with ADHD.Methods This single-dose, randomized, open-label, 3-period crossover study was conducted in children aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD symptoms that adversely affected school performance and required a medication switch. Eligible patients had prior stimulant experience, with good tolerability. Patients were administered a single oral dose of LDX 30, 50, or 70 mg in a randomized sequence. Each study period was separated by a 6-day washout. The pharmacokinetic properties of d-amphetamine and intact LDX were calculated over 48 hours. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using physical examination, including vital sign measurements, and ECG.Results The study enrolled 18 children (mean [SD] age, 9.6 [1.9] years [range, 6-12 years]; 56% boys; weight, 36.0 [7.6] kg; 44% white, 44% black). Mean (%CV) C(max) values of d-amphetamine postdose were 53.2 (18.1), 93.3 (19.5), and 134.0 (19.4) ng/mL with LDX 30, 50, and 70 mg, respectively (T(max), approximately 3.5 hours). These findings suggest that the overall AUC for d-amphetamine was dose proportional. The intact LDX AUC was 10% to 20% higher in girls than in boys, and for d-amphetamine was <10% higher. The most commonly reported AEs, of 17 total cases, with 30-, 50-, and 70-mg LDX were anorexia (4 [22%], 7 [41%], and 8 [47%], respectively), elevated blood pressure (2 [11%], 1 [6%], and 3 [18%]), and abdominal pain (2 [11%], 2 [12%], and 2 [12%]). All AEs were mild or moderate. No serious AEs were reported. One child was withdrawn from the analysis because of pharyngitis considered to be unrelated to LDX use.Conclusion The findings from this study in a small, select population of children with ADHD suggest that the concentrations of d-amphetamine, the active metabolite of LDX, after single-dose administration of LDX at increasing doses appeared to be dose proportional and had low interpatient variability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.02.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In children with ADHD, lisdexamfetamine doses of 30 mg, 50 mg, and 70 mg produced a dose-proportional increase in the area under the curve and Cmax of dextroamphetamine with low interpatient variability.

    “A dose-proportional increase in the area under the curve and Cmax of dextroamphetamine with low interpatient variability was demonstrated in children with ADHD using doses of 30 mg, 50 mg, and 70 mg.15”
  • The efficacy and side-effects of LDX are similar to the other long-acting stimulant preparations.

    “The efficacy and side-effects of LDX are similar to the other long-acting stimulant preparations [68-72].”

    From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [72]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 72

Authors
Boellner, S. W., Stark, J. G., Krishnan, S., & Zhang, Y.
Corresponding author
Boellner, Samuel W.
Venue
Clinical Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
252-264
ISSN
0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029958335
Cited by
72
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, d-amphetamine, pharmacokinetics, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, dose proportionality, prodrugs, stimulant medication, sex differences, adverse events, anorexia, dose escalation, crossover design, Cmax, AUC
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Administration, Oral, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Biotransformation, Child, Dextroamphetamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Prodrugs, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review