Cited by 24Medication Adherence and ComplianceDiabetes Management and EducationPain Mechanisms and Treatments

A Retrospective Database Analysis of Neuropathic Pain and Oral Antidiabetic Medication Use and Adherence Among Texas Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Enrolled in Medicaid

Oladapo, Abiola O., Barner, Jamie C., Rascati, Karen L., Strassels, Scott A.·2012·Clinical Therapeutics

Abstract

Background Adherence to oral antidiabetic (OAD) medications is essential in achieving glycemic control and slowing the progression of diabeties-related complications such as neuropathic pain. OAD medication adherence has been suboptimal and adding neuropathic pain medications may negatively affect adherence. However, little is known about adherence to neuropathic pain medications by patients with diabetes and how this may be related to OAD medication adherence.Objective The objectives of our study were to: (1) describe painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) and OAD medication use, (2) determine if PDPN medication adherence differs among individual PDPN medications (ie, tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin, pregabalin, and duloxetine); and (3) determine if PDPN medication adherence is related to post-index OAD medication adherence while controlling for covariates.Methods This retrospective prescription claims database study included continuously enrolled Texas Medicaid beneficiaries who were adult (aged 30-64 years) prescribed OAD (pre- and post-index) and PDPN (post-index) medications. Data were extracted from June 1, 2003 to October 31, 2009. The main study outcome was post-index OAD medication adherence. Primary independent variables included PDPN medication adherence and PDPN medication type. Demographic and medication use characteristics served as covariates. Adherence was measured both continuously and dichotomously (80% cut-off) using medication possession ratio (MPR).Results The sample's (n = 4277) overall mean MPR (SD) for PDPN medications was 75.4% (23.9%). Mean MPR differed significantly among individual PDPN medications (P < 0.0001) and was highest for duloxetine (85.6% [18.2%]) and lowest for pregabalin (69.4% [24.9%]). Overall mean MPR (SD) for OAD medications decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) from 73.0% (24.3%) in the pre-index period to 64.5% (25.6%) in the post-index period. After controlling for covariates, nonadherers (ie, MPR <80%) to PDPN medications, compared with adherers (ie, MPR ≥80%), were significantly less likely to be adherent to OAD medications in the post-index period (odds ratio = 0.626; 95% CI, 0.545-0.719).Conclusions Overall, these data suggest that mean adherence to both PDPN and OAD medications was suboptimal (MPR <80%). Patients who were adherent to PDPN medications were more adherent to OAD medications in the post-index period, but OAD medication adherence was independent of the type of PDPN medication used. OAD adherence decreased from pre- to post-index (ie, when patients were prescribed PDPN medications), which may indicate an opportunity for practitioners to emphasize the importance of OAD adherence in reducing the progression to neuropathy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.02.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 24

Authors
Oladapo, A. O., Barner, J. C., Rascati, K. L., & Strassels, S. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Barner, Jamie C.
Venue
Clinical Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
605-613
ISSN
0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996838131
Cited by
24
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
neuropathic pain, diabetic neuropathic pain, oral antidiabetic drugs, medication adherence, medication possession ratio, gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine, tricyclic antidepressants, Medicaid beneficiaries, type 2 diabetes, prescription claims data, drug interactions, glycemic control, Texas Medicaid, adults with diabetes
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Neuropathies, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insurance Claim Review, Male, Medicaid, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Texas, United States, Databases, Factual, Drug Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review