Cited by 8Climate change impacts on agricultureFisheries and Aquaculture StudiesAgricultural risk and resilience

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hard and soft climate-smart investments in aquaculture in Bangladesh: Conditioning factors and decision space

Open access

Abstract

Climate change and its’ associated weather variabilities and extremes are posing significant risks to aquaculture productivity, particularly in the coastal regions of Bangladesh. Concurrently, the increasing population and shifting consumption patterns are driving higher demand for aquacultural products. This study investigates the impact of floods, heavy rainfall, tidal surges, high temperatures, droughts, erratic rainfall, and water quality parameters (Dissolved Oxygen, ammonia, pH) on investments in “hard” assets, such as specific fish-farm equipment (aquaculture nets, fish cages, thermometers, irrigation pumps), to enhance climate resilience. Additionally, the study explores “soft” investments in information services that provide advanced forecasts on monsoon onset, heavy rainfall, dry spells, high temperature and cold spells. The results indicate that the level of investment in climate-smart aquaculture is currently influenced by climate stresses, investment capacity (farm size, family size), aquaculture system characteristics (pond size and depth, type of fish, aggregate yields), and market-related factors (proximity to roads and markets). In the context of climate-informed decision-making, forecast-based advisory services can facilitate the transition to climate-smart aquaculture. However, the benefits of the information services are often linked to substantial investments in hard infrastructure that ensure the effective utilization of climate information and advisory services. This absence of accessible climate information services and the capacity to invest in climate smart equipment that makes the information actionable, hinder the transition to climate smart aquaculture by smallholder farmers and hence threaten their livelihood and nutritional security.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100527

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Abisha, 2022, Sustainable development of climate-resilient aquaculture and culture-based fisheries through adaptation of abiotic stresses: a review, J. Water Clim. Change, 13, 2671, 10.2166/wcc.2022.045 · DOI
  2. Adams, 2021, The nexuses between technology adoption and socioeconomic changes among farmers in Ghana, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 173, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121133 · DOI
  3. Ahmed, 2015, Aqua-drugs and chemicals: Impact on fish health and production in Mymensingh, Bangladesh, Res. Agricult. Livestock Fisher., 2, 161, 10.3329/ralf.v2i1.23054 · DOI
  4. Beveridge, 2013, Meeting the food and nutrition needs of the poor: the role of fish and the opportunities and challenges emerging from the rise of aquaculturea, J. Fish Biol., 83, 1067, 10.1111/jfb.12187 · DOI
  5. Boyd, 2022, The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply, Food Secur., 14, 805, 10.1007/s12571-021-01246-9 · DOI
  6. Colgan, 2019, Can climate-smart aquaculture enable women's empowerment in rural Bangladesh? Penang, Malaysia: CGIAR Research Program on Fish Agri-Food Systems, Program Brief
  7. Dastagir, 2015, Modeling recent climate change induced extreme events in Bangladesh: A review, Weather Clim. Extremes, 7, 49, 10.1016/j.wace.2014.10.003 · DOI
  8. DoF, (2018). Yearbook of Fisheries Statistics of Bangladesh, 2017-18. Fisheries Resources Survey System (FRSS), Department of Fisheries. Bangladesh: Ministry of Fisheries, 2018. Volume 35: 631 p. 129.
  9. Dubey, 2017, Farmers' perceptions of climate change, impacts on freshwater aquaculture and adaptation strategies in climatic change hotspots: a case of the Indian Sundarban delta, Environ. Dev., 21, 38, 10.1016/j.envdev.2016.12.002 · DOI
  10. FAO (2024). In Brief to The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024. Blue Transformation in action. Rome. Doi: 10.4060/cd0690en. · DOI
  11. Giua, C., Materia, V.C. Camanzi, L, (2022). Smart farming technologies adoption: Which factors play a role in the digital transition?. Technology in Society, 68, pp.101869. · DOI
  12. Hasimuna, 2019, Cage aquaculture production in Zambia: Assessment of opportunities and challenges on Lake Kariba, Siavonga district, The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 45, 281, 10.1016/j.ejar.2019.06.007 · DOI
  13. Hemal, 2017, Present status and problems of fish seed marketing in Sylhet district, Bangladesh, Research in Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries, 4, 45, 10.3329/ralf.v4i1.32405 · DOI
  14. Hobday, 2018, A framework for combining seasonal forecasts and climate projections to aid risk management for fisheries and aquaculture, Front. Mar. Sci., 5, 10.3389/fmars.2018.00137 · DOI
  15. Hossain, 2021, Developing climate information services for aquaculture in Bangladesh: A decision framework for managing temperature and rainfall variability-induced risks, Front. Sustainable Food Syst., 5
  16. Hossain, P. R., Kakwasha, K., Maluwa, A., & Mumba, P. (2024). Introduction to digital climate information services for aquatic food systems in Malawi: a dialogue-cum-training workshop report.
  17. Hossain, 2018, Adaptation pathways to cope with salinization in south-west coastal region of Bangladesh, Ecol. Soc., 23, 10.5751/ES-10215-230327 · DOI
  18. Hu, 2020, A method overview in smart aquaculture, Environ. Monit. Assess., 192, 1, 10.1007/s10661-020-08409-9 · DOI
  19. Islam, 2019, Vulnerability of inland and coastal aquaculture to climate change: evidence from a developing country, Aquacult. Fish., 4, 183
  20. Islam, 2024, Economic valuation of climate induced losses to aquaculture for evaluating climate information services in Bangladesh, Clim. Risk Manag., 43
  21. Kashem, 2017, Coastal zone of Khulna district in Bangladesh: Fisheries land use and its potentials, Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud, 5, 599
  22. Kumar, 2021, Climate change and aquaculture: A review of impacts and adaptation strategies, J. Environ. Manage., 288
  23. Le Quyen, 2019, Factors affecting the adoption of climate-smart aquaculture (CSAq) in the North Central Coast of Vietnam, CCAFS Working Paper.
  24. Little, 2016, Aquaculture: a rapidly growing and significant source of sustainable food? Status, transitions and potential, Proc. Nutr. Soc., 75, 274, 10.1017/S0029665116000665 · DOI
  25. Maddala, 1983, Vol. 149
  26. Matin, 2016, An assessment of shrimp aquaculture in selected coastal areas of Bangladesh, J. NOAMI, 33, 103
  27. Maulu, 2021, Climate Change Effects on Aquaculture Production: Sustainability Implications, Mitigation, and Adaptations, Front. Sustainable Food Syst., 5, 70
  28. Maulu, 2024, Perceived effects of climate change on aquaculture production in Zambia: status, vulnerability factors, and adaptation strategies, Front. Sustainable Food Syst., 8, 1348984, 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1348984 · DOI
  29. Mohanty, 2017, The impact of climate change on marine and inland fisheries and aquaculture in India, Climate Change Impacts on Fisheries and Aquaculture: a Global Analysis, 2, 569, 10.1002/9781119154051.ch17 · DOI
  30. Montes, 2022, Developing a framework for an early warning system of seasonal temperature and rainfall tailored to aquaculture in Bangladesh, Clim. Serv., 26
  31. Muthoka, 2024, Socio-economic impacts of climate change and adaptation actions among smallholder fish farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa, Aquacult. Fish Fish., 4, e182, 10.1002/aff2.182 · DOI
  32. Parvaiz, 2024, Bangladeshi fish farms ‘need climate data support’, SciDev.
  33. Parvin, 2023, Coastal aquaculture in Bangladesh: Sundarbans's role against climate change, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 194, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115431 · DOI
  34. Paul, 2024, climate change effects on the small-scale fisheries in the northern part of bangladesh and associated adaptation measures, Khulna University Studies, 33
  35. Pedersen, 2024, Drivers and Barriers to Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices and Technologies Adoption: Insights from stakeholders of Five European Food Supply Chains, Smart Agric. Technol., 100478
  36. Rahman, 2017, Aqua drugs and chemicals used in fish farms of Comilla regions, Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 5, 2462, 10.22271/j.ento.2017.v5.i6ah.2893 · DOI
  37. Resnick, D., Baethgen, W., Hossain, P., & Kadam, S. (2024). Exploration of a model driven by climate to simulate pond water temperature in aquaculture systems. · DOI
  38. Rifat, 2023, Nutritional value of the marine fish in Bangladesh and their potential to address malnutrition: A review, Heliyon, 9, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13385 · DOI
  39. Shamsuzzaman, 2017, Fisheries resources of Bangladesh: Present status and future direction, Aquacult. Fish., 2, 145
  40. Sheikh, 2003, Logit models for identifying the factors that influence the uptake of new ‘no-tillage’ technologies by farmers in the rice–wheat and the cotton–wheat farming systems of Pakistan's Punjab, Agr. Syst., 75, 79, 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00014-8 · DOI
  41. Siddiqua, 2019, Assessment of the livelihood status of fish farmers and aquaculture conditions in Habigonj Sadar Upazila under Habigonj district, Bangladesh. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud., 7, 105
  42. Trinh, 2016, Climate-smart aquaculture: Evidences and potentials for northern coastal area of Vietnam, CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Working Paper
  43. Troell, 2014, Does aquaculture add resilience to the global food system?, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, 13257, 10.1073/pnas.1404067111 · DOI
  44. Uddin, 2019, Fish culture in cages and pens for aquaculture diversification in Bangladesh. Diversification, Aquaculture, 13
  45. Yadav, 2024, Climate change effects on aquaculture production and its sustainable management through climate-resilient adaptation strategies: a review, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 1

Metadata

Authors
Amjath-Babu, T. S., Hossain, P. R., Anee, S. A., Mohammed, E. Y., & Krupnik, T. J.
Affiliations
  • International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (BD)
  • WorldFish (MY)
Corresponding author
Amjath-Babu, T.S.
Venue
Climate Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
37
Pages
100527
ISSN
2405-8807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404938710
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climate Services (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
CGIAR
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Fisheries and Aquaculture Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural risk and resilience
Keywords
climate-smart aquaculture, climate change impacts on aquaculture, climate services, small-scale fish farmers, climate resilience, climate decision-making, investment capacity, water quality, droughts and floods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hard and soft climate-smart investments in aquaculture in Bangladesh: Conditioning factors and decision space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100527
The paper
Amjath-Babu, T. S., Hossain, P. R., Anee, S. A., Mohammed, E. Y., & Krupnik, T. J. (2025). Hard and soft climate-smart investments in aquaculture in Bangladesh: Conditioning factors and decision space. Climate Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100527