The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Clinico-Pathologic Features, Treatment, and Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Clinical features and management of large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma of the lung are poorly described. We report a series of 49 patients with stage IV large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinomas; 47% had brain metastases. In 17 patients with molecular testing, 24% of tumors harbored KRAS mutations. Response to platinum/etoposide in these patients was poorer than historic data for small-cell lung cancer, however prognosis was similar. Background Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) accounts for approximately 3% of lung cancers. Pathologic classification and optimal therapies are debated. We report the clinicopathologic features, treatment and survival of a series of patients with stage IV LCNEC. Materials and Methods Cases of pathologically-confirmed stage IV LCNEC evaluated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2006 to 2013 were identified. We collected demographic, treatment, and survival data. Available radiology was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Results Forty-nine patients with stage IV LCNEC were identified. The median age was 64 years, 63% of patients were male, and 88% were smokers. Twenty-three patients (n = 23/49; 47%) had brain metastases, 17 at diagnosis and 6 during the disease course. Seventeen LCNEC patients (35%) had molecular testing, of which 24% had KRAS mutations (n = 4/17). Treatment data for first-line metastatic disease was available on 37 patients: 70% (n = 26) received platinum/etoposide and 30% (n = 11) received other regimens. RECIST was completed on 23 patients with available imaging; objective response rate was 37% (95% confidence interval, 16%–62%) with platinum/etoposide, while those treated with other first-line regimens did not achieve a response. Median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval, 8.6–16.4 months) for the entire cohort. Conclusion Patients with stage IV LCNEC have a high incidence of brain metastases. KRAS mutations are common. Patients with stage IV LCNEC do not respond as well to platinum/etoposide compared with historic data for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer; however, the prognosis is similar. Prospective studies are needed to define optimum therapy for stage IV LCNEC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rossi, G., Cavazza, A., Marchioni, A., Longo, L., Migaldi, M., Sartori, G., Bigiani, N., Schirosi, L., Casali, C., Morandi, U., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.02.8233 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Rudin, C. M., Pietanza, M. C., Bauer, T. M., Ready, N., Morgensztern, D., Glisson, B. S., Byers, L. A., Johnson, M. L., Burris, H. A., Robert, F., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30565-4 · Cited by 574
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Naidoo, J., Santos-Zabala, M. L., Iyriboz, T., Woo, K. M., Sima, C. S., Fiore, J. J., Kris, M. G., Riely, G. J., Lito, P., Iqbal, A., Veach, S., Smith-Marrone, S., Sarkaria, I. S., Krug, L. M., Rudin, C. M., Travis, W. D., Rekhtman, N., & Pietanza, M. C.
- Venue
- Clinical Lung Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e121-e129
- ISSN
- 1525-7304 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2262621604
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Clinico-Pathologic Features, Treatment, and Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cllc.2016.01.003
- The paper
- Naidoo, J., Santos-Zabala, M. L., Iyriboz, T., Woo, K. M., Sima, C. S., Fiore, J. J., Kris, M. G., Riely, G. J., Lito, P., Iqbal, A., Veach, S., Smith-Marrone, S., Sarkaria, I. S., Krug, L. M., Rudin, C. M., Travis, W. D., Rekhtman, N., & Pietanza, M. C. (2016). Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Clinico-Pathologic Features, Treatment, and Outcomes. Clinical Lung Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2016.01.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.