Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Clinico-Pathologic Features, Treatment, and Outcomes

Open access
Naidoo, Jarushka, Santos-Zabala, Maria L., Iyriboz, Tunc, Woo, Kaitlin M., Sima, Camelia S., Fiore, John J., Kris, Mark G., Riely, Gregory J., Lito, Piro, Iqbal, Afsheen, Veach, Stephen, Smith-Marrone, Stephanie, Sarkaria, Inderpal S., Krug, Lee M., Rudin, Charles M., Travis, William D., Rekhtman, Natasha, Pietanza, Maria C.·2016·Clinical Lung Cancer

Abstract

Clinical features and management of large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma of the lung are poorly described. We report a series of 49 patients with stage IV large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinomas; 47% had brain metastases. In 17 patients with molecular testing, 24% of tumors harbored KRAS mutations. Response to platinum/etoposide in these patients was poorer than historic data for small-cell lung cancer, however prognosis was similar. Background Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) accounts for approximately 3% of lung cancers. Pathologic classification and optimal therapies are debated. We report the clinicopathologic features, treatment and survival of a series of patients with stage IV LCNEC. Materials and Methods Cases of pathologically-confirmed stage IV LCNEC evaluated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2006 to 2013 were identified. We collected demographic, treatment, and survival data. Available radiology was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. Results Forty-nine patients with stage IV LCNEC were identified. The median age was 64 years, 63% of patients were male, and 88% were smokers. Twenty-three patients (n = 23/49; 47%) had brain metastases, 17 at diagnosis and 6 during the disease course. Seventeen LCNEC patients (35%) had molecular testing, of which 24% had KRAS mutations (n = 4/17). Treatment data for first-line metastatic disease was available on 37 patients: 70% (n = 26) received platinum/etoposide and 30% (n = 11) received other regimens. RECIST was completed on 23 patients with available imaging; objective response rate was 37% (95% confidence interval, 16%–62%) with platinum/etoposide, while those treated with other first-line regimens did not achieve a response. Median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval, 8.6–16.4 months) for the entire cohort. Conclusion Patients with stage IV LCNEC have a high incidence of brain metastases. KRAS mutations are common. Patients with stage IV LCNEC do not respond as well to platinum/etoposide compared with historic data for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer; however, the prognosis is similar. Prospective studies are needed to define optimum therapy for stage IV LCNEC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.01.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Naidoo, J., Santos-Zabala, M. L., Iyriboz, T., Woo, K. M., Sima, C. S., Fiore, J. J., Kris, M. G., Riely, G. J., Lito, P., Iqbal, A., Veach, S., Smith-Marrone, S., Sarkaria, I. S., Krug, L. M., Rudin, C. M., Travis, W. D., Rekhtman, N., & Pietanza, M. C.
Venue
Clinical Lung Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
e121-e129
ISSN
1525-7304 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2262621604
Cited by
165
References
1
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Clinico-Pathologic Features, Treatment, and Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cllc.2016.01.003
The paper
Naidoo, J., Santos-Zabala, M. L., Iyriboz, T., Woo, K. M., Sima, C. S., Fiore, J. J., Kris, M. G., Riely, G. J., Lito, P., Iqbal, A., Veach, S., Smith-Marrone, S., Sarkaria, I. S., Krug, L. M., Rudin, C. M., Travis, W. D., Rekhtman, N., & Pietanza, M. C. (2016). Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: Clinico-Pathologic Features, Treatment, and Outcomes. Clinical Lung Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2016.01.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.