Cited by 46Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Outcomes of First-Generation EGFR-TKIs Against Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Post Hoc Analysis of the BE-POSITIVE Study

Open access
Pilotto, Sara, Rossi, Antonio, Vavalà, Tiziana, Follador, Alessandro, Tiseo, Marcello, Galetta, Domenico, Morabito, Alessandro, Di Maio, Massimo +21 more·2018·Clinical Lung Cancer

Abstract

Background Beyond progression after tyrosine kinase inhibitor in EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients (BE-POSITIVE) was the first Italian multicenter observational study that reported the outcomes of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in a "real-life" Caucasian EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population. The sharing of multi-institutional experiences represents a crucial strategy to enrich knowledge about uncommon EGFR mutations. Therefore, we performed a post hoc analysis of the BE-POSITIVE study.Patients and methods Data of advanced NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations who received first-line first-generation EGFR-TKIs in 24 Italian Hospitals were collected. In this analysis we aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR) of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations.Results Thirty-five patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations (any mutation other than deletion 19 or substitution of leucine by arginine at codon 858) were included of the original 312 EGFR-mutated cases. Most of them were female (n = 20, 57.1%), former smokers (n = 23, 65.7%), with adenocarcinoma (n = 31, 88.6%). The most frequent EGFR mutations were G719X (n = 6, 17.2%) and L861Q (n = 5, 14.2%). The population presented an ORR of 25.7%, a median PFS of 5.19 months, and a median OS of 14.49 months. When stratified according to type of EGFR mutation, median OS ranged from 3.65 months for unspecified mutations to 21.29 for double EGFR mutations. Median PFS ranged from 1.77 months for unspecified mutations to 20.83 months for concomitant EGFR-anaplastic lymphoma kinase alteration. ORR varied from 0% in exon 18, 20 and double gene alteration to 66.6% in exon 19.Conclusion Our study supports the existence of a strong outcome heterogeneity within patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations, which needs to be clarified to achieve a real personalized treatment strategy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.05.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 46

Authors
Pilotto, S., Rossi, A., Vavalà, T., Follador, A., Tiseo, M., Galetta, D., Morabito, A., Di Maio, M., Martelli, O., Caffo, O., Piovano, P. L., Cortinovis, D., Zilembo, N., Casartelli, C., Banna, G. L., Ardizzoia, A., Barzelloni, M. L., Bearz, A., Genestreti, G., Mucciarini, C., Filipazzi, V., Menis, J., Rizzo, E., Barbieri, F., Rijavec, E., Cecere, F., Spitaleri, G., Bria, E., & Novello, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • University of Udine (IT)
  • Istituto Tumori Bari (IT)
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata (IT)
  • Ospedale Santa Chiara (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT)
  • Ospedale Valduce (IT)
  • Ospedale Cannizzaro (IT)
  • Alessandro Manzoni Hospital (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati (IT)
  • Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT)
  • Luigi Sacco Hospital (IT)
  • European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (BE)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
  • European Institute of Oncology (IT)
Corresponding author
Pilotto, Sara
Venue
Clinical Lung Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
93-104
ISSN
1525-7304 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2621269107
Cited by
46
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Lung Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Italian Association for Cancer Research (14282)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, first-line therapy, uncommon EGFR mutations, overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate, real-world outcomes, G719X, L861Q
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Polymorphism, Genetic, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Precision Medicine, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review