Activity of EGFR TKIs in Caucasian Patients With NSCLC Harboring Potentially Sensitive Uncommon EGFR Mutations
Abstract
Background Molecular characterization of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), defined predictive and druggable mutations that greatly modified patient prognoses. The most frequent driver mutations detected in NSCLC are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, accounting for approximately 90% of exon 19 deletions and exon 21 point mutations. The other EGFR mutations are classified as uncommon or nonclassical and include exon 18 point mutations, exon 20 insertions, and combined mutations, which present different sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting.Patients and methods We collected data from EGFR TKI-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC, harboring EGFR exon 18 mutations and EGFR combined mutations treated with first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs. Efficacy end points were evaluated considering the activity of EGFR TKIs in exon 18 versus double-mutation EGFR groups.Results Eighty-eight patients harboring uncommon EGFR mutations were evaluated in our analysis, and subdivided into 2 group: complex mutations (cohort A = 46 patients) and double mutations in exon 18 (cohort B = 42 patients). The results showed a median progression-free survival of 8.3 versus 12.3 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; P = .06) and a median overall survival of 17.0 versus 31.0 months (HR, 0.62, P = .04) favoring the EGFR combination group. Within the combination group, no detrimental effect was associated with exon 20 mutations.Conclusion Our study confirmed that EGFR exon 18 and combination mutations might be considered potentially sensitive uncommon mutations, with a similar survival compared with the well known common EGFR mutations. Comparative analysis showed that patients with complex mutations achieved longer survival compared with the exon 18 group, without correlation with the presence of exon 20 mutations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients harboring exon 18 mutations benefit from EGFR TKI as first-line treatment compared with chemotherapy, with median PFS 14.6 months vs 5.8 months.
“Patients harboring exon 18 mutations benefit from EGFR TKI as first-line treatment, as opposed to chemotherapy (median PFS 14.6 months vs. 5.8 months)”
Proximal exon 18 substitutions show the highest sensitivity to anti-EGFR blockage.
“with proximal exon 18 substitutions showing the highest sensitivity to anti-EGFR blockage [32,33].”
The G719X + S768I compound mutation (about 1% of all EGFR mutations) is sensitive to first-generation EGFR TKIs but to a lesser extent than classic mutations, with ORR approximately 50% and median PFS of 8-10 months.
“One of the most frequent compound mutations is the G719X + S768I (about 1% of all EGFR mutations) [37,84], which has been shown to be sensitive to the first-generation EGFR TKIs, but to a lesser extent than classic mutations (ORR approximately 50% and median PFS of 8–10 months) [12,33,46].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Passaro, A., Prelaj, A., Bonanno, L., Tiseo, M., Tuzi, A., Proto, C., Chiari, R., Rocco, D., Genova, C., Sini, C., Cortinovis, D., Pilotto, S., Landi, L., Bennati, C., Camerini, A., Toschi, L., Putzu, C., Cerea, G., Spitaleri, G., Cappuzzo, F., & de Marinis, F.
- Affiliations
- European Institute of Oncology (IT)
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT)
- Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT)
- Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale dei Sette Laghi (IT)
- University of Perugia (IT)
- Ospedale Monaldi (IT)
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
- University of Verona (IT)
- Ospedale Versilia (IT)
- Fondazione Humanitas per la Ricerca (IT)
- University of Sassari (IT)
- Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Passaro, Antonio
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Lung Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e186-e194
- ISSN
- 1525-7304 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900799599
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Lung Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, non-small cell lung cancer, uncommon EGFR mutations, exon 20 insertion, exon 19 deletion, progression-free survival, overall survival, metastatic lung cancer, predictive biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Exons, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review