Cited by 275Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementHead and Neck Cancer StudiesNutrition and Health in Aging

Long-term prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients: Impact on quality of life

García-Peris, P., Parón, L., Velasco, C., de la Cuerda, C., Camblor, M., Bretón, I., Herencia, H., Verdaguer, J. +2 more·2007·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims To determine the prevalence of dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. To study the impact of dysphagia on food habits, nutritional status, and quality of life. Methods Retrospective cross-sectional study of 87 head and neck cancer patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy from January 2000 through May 2005. Time since surgery was 28.5+/-17.8 months. A clinical test was used to detect dysphagia. A nutritional assessment was performed in all patients. A questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of life. Results Oropharyngeal dysphagia was present in 50.6% of patients, mostly to solid foods (72.4%). Patients with total glossectomy and chemoradiotherapy had the highest rate of dysphagia. Nutritional support was necessary in 57.1% of patients. Malnutrition was present in 20.3% of patients, mainly marasmus (81%). Fifty-one percent of patients reported a decrease in their quality of life due to dysphagia. Conclusions We found a high prevalence of dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients treated with surgery and coadjuvant treatment. This problem negatively affects their quality of life. It is important that nutritional surveillance be provided to detect it and to prevent malnutrition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.08.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dysphagia is associated with many negative clinical short- and long-term outcomes, such as pneumonia, malnutrition, dehydration, and reduced quality of life.

    “Dysphagia is associated with many negative clinical short- and long-term outcomes, such as”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [185]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García-Peris, P., Parón, L., Velasco, C., de la Cuerda, C., Camblor, M., Bretón, I., Herencia, H., Verdaguer, J., Navarro, C., & Clave, P.
Affiliations
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES)
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
710-717
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009100886
Cited by
275
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
14.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
oropharyngeal dysphagia, head and neck cancer, quality of life, malnutrition, nutritional status, nutritional support, chemoradiotherapy, total glossectomy, dietary habits, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Cross-Sectional Studies, Deglutition Disorders, Female, Glossectomy, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Mandible, Maxilla, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Protein-Energy Malnutrition, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Radiotherapy, Retrospective Studies, Nutrition Assessment, Prevalence, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review